Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sascha Kreiger/Archive

31 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Admits to being sockpuppeteer on User talk:Paul Siebert. Using socks to engage in edit wars. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  16:57, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

As far as I understand, he is not a sockpuppet. After I warned him about that, he explained on his talk page that they are the friends of the user Anonymiss Madchen, and they are going to act in concert against me. He, as well as Genocide Denial Watch is obviously a newcomer, who simply does not understand some basic WP policy. I explained the policy to them, and I believe that may be sufficient.--Paul Siebert (talk) 17:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * As this is obvious meat-puppetry checks are NOT appropriate. However, both Sascha Kreiger and Genocide Denial Watch have been blocked indefinitely for Meat-puppetry and harrassment - see Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents for more-- Cailil   talk 17:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Both are blocked, so we're done. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:10, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

15 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Always the same agenda: harassing User:Paul Siebert, and trolling articles concerning Soviet warcrimes and the Holocaust; has already operated multiple sockpuppet accounts before (User:Sascha_Kreiger, User:Genocide Denial Watch; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Anonyma_M%C3%A4del ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Imperator_Sascha JohnCrehan (talk) 16:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ that these two are the same:
 * retired in November and is clearly Anonyma_Mädel. I would also like to know who the filer is, who shows up so abruptly filing SPIs within their first twenty edits. TN X Man  16:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * "I would also like to know who the filer is" --> Just asking would have been an option. Sascha_Kreiger/ Anonymiss Madchen or whatever account name you want to bill this person to has been a longtime griever and troll on multiple of our Wiki projects (Wikia, Wikii etc.). After he started inserting wrong information into the Wikipedia and using our Wiki projects as the source for offensive information (wrongly) we had to act to prevent damage to our projects. In fact we have quite a collection of the aliases he uses on his trolling sprees all over the web, but this won't be of any use here. If you want to start untangling his "web" you have to go back to his "Sascha Kreiger" alias under which he established and operated his "Sturmkrieg" or "Sturmkreig" wiki. Which you can by the way also find referenced on the talk page of User:Paul Siebert. And look who the admin of Sturmkrieg Wiki is, yes, it is indeed "Imperator Sascha". Who, as you will easily discover is just a re-naming of the original "Sascha Kreiger" account. And in fact "Anonymiss Madchen" of course never "retired". He just retired this account to use other accounts for his trolling. We have been following and observing this practice of his since ca. 2010. For more in depth information contact us. --JohnCrehan (talk) 18:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Which doesn't answer the question of who you are--let alone "you" in the plural. So let's ask: who are you? Drmies (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)^
 * I am User:JohnCrehan. A regular contributor in a number of wiki projects (Wikia and Wikii and others) ranging from SF to WWII. And what Mr Kreiger does on WWII wikis and boards, well, just check the Anonymiss Madchen contributions and you know what his game is. So I guess you can also consider me as a self-declared trollhunter to clear the likes of him out of wikis. As to your other question: "us" is the collective of people he "impressed" so much that they'd like to protect other projects from him. --JohnCrehan (talk) 21:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * By the way you can also add User:Stefan Oswald1 to the list of his sockpuppet accounts. He confessed it himself, see his contributions. --JohnCrehan (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No, the question was really who you were before you were this. But that's for another time, perhaps. Tnxman, PBS asked me on my talk page about tagging the puppets; I think I should leave that for you all, the experts. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * @JohnCrehan "He confessed it himself, see his contributions" you need to provide diffs for statements like that. This is a permanent record, I could not find the confession easily and a year from now there may not be any of us around to answer further questions on this.  -- PBS (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Addendum as requested: here he says he is StefanOswald1. --JohnCrehan (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * @JohnCrehan "He confessed it himself, see his contributions" you need to provide diffs for statements like that. This is a permanent record, I could not find the confession easily and a year from now there may not be any of us around to answer further questions on this.  -- PBS (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Addendum as requested: here he says he is StefanOswald1. --JohnCrehan (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

So. The four confirmed accounts are blocked. Since everything I see matches Sascha Kreiger I'll call them as his socks, and tagged them accordingly. I believe this can be closed for now. Amalthea 11:55, 18 February 2012 (UTC)