Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Satesclop/Archive

01 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

No technical evidence, but some clear coincidences


 * same disruptive edits and methods (without explanation) on several pages, especially "Spain", in the climatic section ([] [] [][]), and the page "Basque Country"-Autonomous community. Apparently, Diplomatiko and Satesclop want to push the same map : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_Country_%28autonomous_community%29&diff=406505709&oldid=406505611, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_Country_%28autonomous_community%29&diff=399500964&oldid=398966861 , http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_Country_%28autonomous_community%29&diff=381862804&oldid=381504525 , http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_Country_%28autonomous_community%29&diff=374504562&oldid=374412085 ...


 * Diplomatiko, who is a Spanish user, has been expulsed from the Spanish wiki for his disruptives edits, behaviour, and due to sockpuppetry (http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Diplomatiko ).


 * Satesclop claims in his talk page that he comes from Granada ( User:Satesclop), and in the same time, Diplomatiko is involved in discussions about Granada in several differents wiki http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Diplomatiko, http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuari_Discussi%C3%B3:Diplomatiko, http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiproyecto_Discusi%C3%B3n:Granada...

Those are not proofs, I can mistake, but they are serious indications anyway. Milkrawler (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' User: Milkrawler has a history of sock-puppetry (see the talk history of Celts) and seems to be developing a track on accusing anyone who disagrees with him/her of sock-puppetry - playing with the rules? (He or she developed several socks on Celts, and was the subject of a checkuser investigation which resulted in several accounts being censured/blocked) Gabhala (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Direct link to Sock investigation - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Erfurt150/Archive

Gabhala (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Per behavioral evidence, I've blocked and tagged Diplomatiko as a sock of Satesclop. And I also blocked Milkrawler as a sock of Erfurt. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

18 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All of them follow the same pattern, obsessed with anything that they could consider against Spanish nationalism. One clear instance is the crusade they carried out both in Basque Country (autonomous community) and Valencian Community—for example see this, this, this, this, and this edits for the Basque Community; and this, this, this, this, and this for the Valencian Community. The suspected sockmaster, Satesclop, has already been blocked forever in his/her Spanish Wikipedia account (es:Usuario:Satesclop) for sockpuppetry. He/She also has broken WP:CANVAS in the recent votings both in Talk:Valencian Community and Talk:Basque Country (autonomous community)—see Satesclop's edits on 15 February 2016 in several user talk pages with no previous relation with those articles, creating in all of them a section named "Votación sobre mapas" and asking them to vote his/her own map ("Te pido que añadas "support" y tu firma en la opción "Satesclop's red map"") and giving biased reasons against the other maps. Xabier Armendaritz(talk) 06:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . I blocked the master for a week.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I've made this an indef as a checkuser action due to how pervasive the socking was. The history here is too bad for such a short block, given they have been caught socking before. Courcelles (talk) 04:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)