Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish kalathil/Archive

02 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Main was blocked for self-promotion. Sock appealed via UTRS as autoblocked. They clearly edit on the same topic - this guy's film. It's a clear sock - worth seeing if there are any more? Secretlondon (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually the sock is older than the main. They have a spam page on commons User:Jalachhayam_Feature_Film and another account on commons User:Sathish_kalathil Secretlondon (talk) 05:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Another User:Sathish kalathil Secretlondon (talk) 05:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Another User:Sathish_Kalathil_(Film_Director) Secretlondon (talk) 06:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  12:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Moved case name to oldest master and blocked socks indef and tagged.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both uploaded same image, and used, in the permissions section of that file, a website similar in name to a sockpuppet of them: User:Jalachhayam Feature Film  RileyBugz Yell at me  &#124; Edits  02:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's not the same image, just the same title. I'm not convinced, so I'm closing this with no action.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)