Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Satyashiva/Archive

10 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar edits on same set of pages &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  12:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
I think that both Satyashiva and Tarandhoni are sockpuppets of Sanjeetbond as the three of them have the same editing style (poor grammar, forgetting to use the INR Convert template, bare URLs, and ego against Box Office India). I think it should be moved to Sockpuppet investigations/Sanjeetbond. Regards, Plea$ant 1623  ✉  13:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC) ''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * My bad, just today I came across these accounts; not aware of Sanjeetbond. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  17:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Same pattern both edit for Box Office Collections with bare URL's. Troubling a lot in OUATIMD.


 * Note the use of Bare URL's here Tarandhoni.
 * Note the tampering of INR converts here by Satyashiva.$oHƎM ❊ আড্ডা 10:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)


 * See also Sockpuppet investigations/Sameer Arpitaqwe Tito ☸ Dutta 16:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've looked at them versus Sanjeetbond, and there are also a number of marked differences. Additionally, insufficient evidence was presented to convince me that these two are the same. Closed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:46, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

20 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

These socks have already been confirmed by checkuser as part of the results from a different case and have been listed here under the oldest account. I note that in yet another current case where Tarandhoni is listed as a sock, other editors believe this to be sockmaster. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  17:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  17:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocking master one week and indeffing socks but without tags while this is still being looked at.
 * I'm closing this case for now. If they are actually socks of some other master, they can be re-tagged then. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

1 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Strikingly similar edits on same articles.Jionpedia  ✉  13:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Comment - Radharani11 has been recently indefinitely blocked. He has not appealed for an unblock and therefore if he is the sock puppeteer activities for any one of these accounts will increase siginificantly.  Sohambanerjee1998  12:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)