Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scania N113/Archive

Report date January 22 2010, 13:12 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 13:12, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 13:12, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

please can you provide some information as to why you think these accounts are connected and why you think a checkuser is necessary (considering all the accounts are blocked). Thanks SpitfireTally-ho! 18:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Changing code to F, as there is no apparent ArbCom sanction in place here. Also noting that all accounts listed are already blocked, so unless there is a well-founded belief that other accounts are active that have not yet been identified, checkuser will be declined. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

– All the accounts are already blocked and tagged by another admin. No reason has been given justifying running a CU. Next time, when you submit a case, you need to provide evidence for suspected socks. SPI is not "sockpuppet daycare" in which you drop socks off and drive away. –MuZemike 20:59, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I stand corrected as all accounts are already blocked. Apologies for all the trouble caused, I'm very confused as to how these CU things actually goes. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 04:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Conclusions