Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scarecrow102/Archive

19 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

While Carnival102 is providing edit summaries, something Scarecrow102 refuses to do, they are following the same editing pattern that currently has Scarecrow102 blocked - adding plot bloat along with OR/personal opinion across various DC comic book characters related to their animatet universe and the Baman: Arkham video game series. J Greb (talk) 02:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Exceedingly likely, but I'm adding a CU to confirm that the master is indeed evading their block. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅; blocking both accounts indefinitely. After three successive blocks for what appears to be roughly the same thing, enough is enough. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Righto. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

31 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Looks like a solid WP:DUCK, but a CU is requested to verify. J Greb (talk) 23:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sure, I'll endorse to confirm and see if there's anyone else. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ straight match. - Mailer Diablo 03:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  03:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

25 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same content focus and continuation of massive plot incorporation. Since the 'master has evaded in the past a CU is a good idea for verification and shaking lose other socks. J Greb (talk) 23:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Added the simmilarly named account with same focus and start date as RFGKing. - J Greb (talk) 23:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Socks blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK, but endorsing for sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ that both belong to the sockmaster. All socks already blocked. - Mailer Diablo 08:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Tags updated. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:33, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

29 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar editing habits - adding personal view s and unneeded plot - and username formatting - comic book character and number. J Greb (talk) 17:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * You need to be a little more specific here. "Similar editing habits" isn't clear enough: you need to supply diffs and a full explanation as to why the accounts may be connected. The Cavalry (Message me) 21:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

AGK [•] 21:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Please refile if there is relevant evidence. Since were this far out right now, i'm going to mark for a close without processing it. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  03:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)