Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Schami1989/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)




 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

First, I am sorry for my bad Englsh. I am from Germany and I'm not sure I'm right here. In September 2019 Wikipedia blocked this two accounts Schami 1989 and Ekspertiza. A lot of nonsense was done. In June 2020, he created a new page. His language problems are still the same and much needs to be deleted. The same pages are processed in all accounts, mainly about German football. Is this allowed for a blocked user to create a new account? In Germany this is a (German Sperrumgehung) blocking bypass and not allowed. Gscheidles (talk) 11:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Case moved to correct master. There is another previous sock, . Block evasion is indeed prohibited on the English Wikipedia as well (and if I recall correctly, our rules are even stricter than dewiki's). Blablubbs&#124;talk 19:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


In September 2019 Wikipedia blocked this two accounts Schami 1989 and Ekspertiza. A lot of nonsense was done. In June 2020, he created the last Account Almgerdeu. His language problems was still the same and much needs to be deleted. The same pages are processed in all accounts, mainly about German football an wintersport. The account Almgerdeu was blocked in April this year. Now he edits the articles about his own IP address. But that is stil even a blocking bypass and not allowed. Gscheidles (talk) 18:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Comments by other users
I am sorry for the mistake. I am not often in Wikipedia. I wanted to say: The blocked wikipedia account of Schami1989 continues to comment on things. This time about his own VIP address. His edits had to be reset there as well. Gscheidles (talk) 19:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I fixed some formatting errors with the filing. - can an admin clerk please histmerge this to Sockpuppet_investigations/Schami1989? Thanks, Spicy (talk) 02:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Merged. Closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 04:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the merge. I've reopened the case as there hasn't been a decision on what to do with the IP yet. Spicy (talk) 04:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Blablubbs @MarioGom could I ask you guys to look at https://bullseye.toolforge.org/ip/85.132.98.69 and decypher all the proxy stuff for me. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @RoySmith: From a quick glance and with only one datapoint, possible is the best I got. The behaviour certainly does look reminiscent of the master, though. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What I was hoping was that you could look at the bullseye report and help me through all of what "Other proxies: AWM_PROXY (MALWARE), OXYLABS_PROXY (RESIDENTIAL), SMARTPROXY_PROXY (RESIDENTIAL), LUMINATI_PROXY (RESIDENTIAL)" means. Should I care about the specifics of which proxies are in use, or should I just tick off the "proxies, bad" box in my brain and move on? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Got some input on this off-wiki. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Now that the IP is blocked, re-closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)