Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scheunemann.joshua/Archive

13 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Read User and Talk Pages Lhb1239 (talk) 17:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Note: added after case was closed, but before it was archived, for posterity: --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * (already blocked)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I swear on the Holy Bible that i am a long time friend of Joshua Scheunemann and i got to the same high school as him. This is a false sockpupperty claim and it should be closed

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blindingly obvious, Theantiadmin blocked. A clerk might have a better idea of whether checkusering for sleepers or for a possible range block is appropriate. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

✅ –MuZemike 17:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

16 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar look to username, editing same article(s), same type of comments in user space. This edit is a salute to a few of his other socks. I believe sleeper socks should be looked for and this guy has been around before and/or it's very possible he is currently editing under an established account. In my opinion, the incompetent spelling/grammar is manufactured - if he really is so incompetent and new to Wikipedia, how is it that he knows so much about policy (take a look at the policies named in the edit summary here) and knows where to find/how to give barnstars? Lhb1239 (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I am not related to this User:Scheunemann.joshua because I saw the edits on the page about the death of Caylee Anthony, and then fixed what he wrote to make it logical to be put on the wiki page. My sister saw that and wrote that Casey Anthony is guilty and wrote some swears on my page. I am just starting out on wikipedia and I read some tools that Wikipedia uses and that is why I have twinkle on it and that is why I out the expert tag on The Death of Caylee Anthony page because I want an expert opinion to confirm how valid the quote is.

Thank you, Smith.edwin (talk) 14:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ and blocked. Underlying IPs have been hardblocked, and Death of Caylee Anthony has been semi-protected for 2 weeks. –MuZemike 18:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

25 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

and blocked as such. Noting here in case a CU sees cause to check for sleepers. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Just so it's noted somewhere, I just blocked User:Chromebook as another sock of the same person. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Considering the backlog, and without evidence of sleepers, going to close. Rschen7754 04:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)