Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scottishweather/Archive

06 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edit warring over the same ref in Big data. Similar pseudonymous names based on parts of the British Isles, similar wordy POV edit summaries. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:39, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I don't think it's worth someone spending their time looking into this. If you don't agree with my very minor edit then please go ahead and just delete it. I assume you are a big data and computer science expert, so I'll leave it at that and will delete edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Analytics ireland (talk • contribs) 22:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for posting, but this is not about your edits, but whether you have used two separate accounts to make them. It would be most useful if you could comment on this. See the links above for further advice on this.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 23:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm endorsing a check per the similarities in the edits from Scottishweather and then from Analytics ireland. While it's possible that they may be unrelated, it's concerning when a new account is created to continue an edit war like this. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Combining Technical results with the one comment by Mark, i'm going to say . -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  15:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet blocked indef and tagged, master blocked one week, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)