Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scottmallon/Archive

05 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

New user makes this suspicious edit (deletet now).  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing my own request.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Scottmallon and SVC Ventures are ❌. I also think there is no actual behavioral connection as Scottmallon is interested only in self-promotion. SVC Ventures, on the other hand, is promoting its own real estate company in India. Why SVC Ventures "highjacked" the Scottmallon article is admittedly bizarre.
 * SVC Ventures and SVC Group1 are ✅. They are both already blocked, and the issue of whether SVC Ventures had a "right" to create a new account based on the soft block of SVC Group 1 doesn't need to be debated. I don't recomend any tagging; I include this only for the record.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)