Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scottydog77/Archive

Report date May 27 2009, 10:07 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * It appears from IP WHOIS, that this IP owns via a personal server, the IP range 217.37.220.144 - 217.37.220.151
 * It appears from IP WHOIS, that this IP owns via a personal server, the IP range 217.37.220.144 - 217.37.220.151
 * It appears from IP WHOIS, that this IP owns via a personal server, the IP range 217.37.220.144 - 217.37.220.151


 * Evidence submitted by Allstarecho


 * Scottydog77's contributions and 217.37.220.150's contributions to the same articles on Wikipedia, both started editing in August 2008:
 * 217.37.220.150's blanking of Scottydog77's talk page twice today. Second time here after I posted the sockpuppet thread notice.
 * Both users edit warring at David Ogden Stiers per (Scottydog77:) (217.37.220.150:   )
 * Both users commenting at Talk:David Ogden Stiers, one right after the other, with 217.37.220.150 commenting in support of Scottydog7 by name. See and.
 * It appears that anytime either of them reverted someone else's edits on any given article, they were restoring each other's edits that had been removed by another user. For example: Virgin Atlantic Airways: Introduction of content via undo by Scottydog77 here - removal of Scottydog7's edit by MilborneOne here - Undo of MilbourneOne by 217.37.220.150 here. Numerous examples of these 2, the master and the sock, doing this all over Wikipedia in the same articles.
 * Mancunianboy, an account created in February, editing some of the same articles as Scottydog77 and 217.37.220.150 per contribs history with the same arguments. Probably a meatpuppet but worth checking.
 * All 3 editors insisting on the insertion of BLP violating content at David Ogden Stiers, and socking/meating via the talk page of the article as well trying to gain a consensus to include the content regardless of the BLP violation. See Talk:David Ogden Stiers/Archives/2013.
 * All 3 editors fail to sign their comments on talk pages (WP:DUCK). See SineBot attack all 3.


 * Scottydog77 has since been blocked for this threat.


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Do what you want....I do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottydog77 (talk • contribs) 10:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users

Requested by - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 10:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Plenty of evidence to block without CU. — Jake   Wartenberg  14:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Accounts blocked indef. I think someone else got the IP. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 14:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)