Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sedamjedan/Archive

19 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Accounts already blocked per the behavioural evidence (either socking or meatpuppetry with promotional editing), see deleted history of Amanda Eliasch. Areafiftyonedesign sent me an email asking why the page has been deleted, with that plus the username I've blocked as a spamusername but tagged it as well. This definitely looks like another group of paid editors so I'm requesting CU for a sleeper check (whether it ends up confirming it or not, the usernames suggest sockpuppetry). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * per comments above. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are :
 * While the other accounts are presumably meatpuppets, as they are technically ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged now. PhilKnight (talk) 01:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * While the other accounts are presumably meatpuppets, as they are technically ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged now. PhilKnight (talk) 01:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * While the other accounts are presumably meatpuppets, as they are technically ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged now. PhilKnight (talk) 01:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Nothing left to do here, closing case now. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Just noting after the archival that I've blocked . Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)