Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Seelicolnshire/Archive

Evidence submitted by Tyw7
Replies and post seems like from orginating from same person. They continue the same message accross IPs.
 * NOw resorted to spamming my talk page with written reference to seelincolnshire:

== Yon online yet == SeeMe SeeLicolnshire —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.226.6 (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Keith D
Adding further IP address with same spamming links. Keith D (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
Defending yourself against claims

what happens if I don't want too...

And I don't know who Sblaize718, so you got it wrong there.

Why would I uses an account, you'd just lock it. I have a million IP address at my beckon call, a new one every minute, You cannot block me! the range is just way too big, you end up blocking every one.

Put my links back at Ingoldmells and Bolingbroke Castle, and I'll leave your Lincoln castle alone!
 * No deals. In view of your IP-hopping ability, and your inability to understand the problem, I've unusually semi-protected this page, and will continue to do so until you make sense. See my comment below. Rodhull  andemu  01:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users


list of users who have added this, removed 2 regulars and a bot: Seelicolnshire 86.149.120.131 81.129.228.239 86.152.15.49 86.129.8.34 86.168.53.153 86.128.51.44 86.143.88.54 86.164.145.0 86.149.39.79 SeeLiconshire 86.147.133.10 86.172.109.106 86.149.120.8 86.129.16.105 86.168.53.227 86.129.21.122 81.147.161.123 217.42.227.44 86.145.216.83 86.129.21.153 86.129.9.129 86.129.21.254 86.129.12.62 86.168.53.251 86.129.9.58

More info from COIBot report linked from the template above (awaiting generation). --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * All so far are blocked. Cirt (talk) 18:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * , warrants further checkuser investigation. Cirt (talk) 18:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm unsure what a check is supposed to accomplish. Can you elaborate? From the IPs provided, it appears that a rangeblock is not feasible, as the range is way too large. Tim Song (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe scan if the user is still active with another IP? Like following the trail? I don't know. Awaiting respoinse from User:Cirt --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 22:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Checkuser investigation needed, ongoing active disruption, at least one other related registered account, possibly more. Cirt (talk) 00:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Is there a particular reason to suspect sleepers? Tim Song (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * . Checkuser is not going to do anything useful here. The range is a /10, which is way too large to block, and there's no reason to suspect sleepers. The best response here is probably to add the website to the blacklist. Tim Song (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It's probably about time "www.seelincolnshire.co.uk" was added to the Mediawiki blacklist, since this editor seems unremitting and unrepentant. However, if there are any valid uses of this website here, I remain open to be convinced. Rodhull  andemu  01:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Good idea. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 02:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed, deferring to judgement of . :) Cirt (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

I've added this URL to the blacklist now. Hopefully that will go some way to dissuading this individual from continuing their antics. Adambro (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If this continues, maybe we would need an edit filter. Marking as closed, though, as there is little to do here on SPI's part. Tim Song (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)