Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Setenzatsu/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Aside from the nearly identical usernames, editing patterns are extremely similar.

The Setenzatsu.2 account was also registered approximately six months after the Setenzatsu account's indefinite block.

I think this is such an open-and-shut case that CU is not strictly necessary (though I've requested it to be undeniably sure), and there is no clear indication that this user is operating any other accounts, though there is a strong likelihood that, if the Setenzatsu.2 account is blocked, there will probably be a Setenzatsu.3 account created in the near future.

Of course, it is entirely possible this is one massive coincidence and the accounts are not at all related (given that Setenzatsu.2 does not seem to have been warned for making personal attacks, actions which led to Setenzatsu's block), but given the nearly identical usernames and the similar editing patterns, I'm willing to bet there is a connection here. GSK (talk • edits) 18:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * So, it seems almost certain that this is the same user. However, if they have been editing for over four years without causing any disruption, I don't think that blocking them would be productive at this point. I took a quick look through their recent contribs, and I don't see anything that gives alarm, so I'm closing this. Feel free to come back if you see anything that makes you think there is an ongoing problem.  Girth Summit  (blether)  12:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)