Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sexual eugenics/Archive

Evidence submitted by KaySL
Consistent with previous edits by Wiki Historian N OH, who was blocked earlier today for persistently introducing controversial material to Bisexuality related articles, mainly on Bisexual Community. Another sock I believe belongs to Wiki Historian N OH is User:Creative handle, since that account also engaged in near-identical edits. He's created a page at Polyamory bisexuals, which I'm not sure what to do with, since it's essentially just info on regular bisexuals, which he's trying to put a polyamory spin on, as he/Wiki Historian N OH did in the main bisexuality article, prior to it being removed multiple times. KaySL talk 23:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

 * The edits by the suspected sockpuppet definitely look like the Wiki Historian N OH. If they are, with the history of sockpuppetry and disruptive editing, I recommend blocking their main account (already on a 2 week block) indef and blocking their range as well.  I would also recommend deleting the articles created as they are created by a sock of a blocked user.  There is no sense for this user's behavior and it has gone far enough. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 23:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably want to go ahead and add this second suspected, already blocked sockpuppet account to the list and template it as a sock of the master account, just so we can start keeping things straight (slightly inappropriate pun intended, sorry). It's easier to do behavioral analysis when you have the various accounts on hand, and on what I sense as a good probability this user will try to bring this up in some form again in the future, it will be helpful to have everything easily available to facilitate later analysis. On the subject of socking probability itself, I have the DuckTales theme stuck in my head now. Thanks a lot. - Vianello (Talk) 01:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I added User:Creative handle to the list. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 01:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Oh, I do want to point out, as it's kind of a salient point, the user in question was not banned. See WP:BAN. A block is not the same thing. See this page. - Vianello (Talk) 01:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoopsy, my bad. I've edited my section to reflect that! KaySL talk 01:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅ on all reported accounts. –MuZemike 01:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * All accounts blocked and tagged. Contended articles not (at least, yet) deleted. - Vianello (Talk) 01:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)