Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shaider65/Archive

25 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edits to the article Waqas Ali Vicky. IP edits: 1, 2. Registered edits: 1, 2.

IP had already received level 4 warning for spam. First edit by registered user shows exactly the same kind of edit made by the IP. Almost smells like a duck to me. I don't think a checkuser is needed, however the IP ceasing edits after the level 4 warning and the resumption of such edits on a registered account occurs to me that this behaviour might worsen. Optakeover (Talk)   14:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Not exactly a sockpuppetry case, not exactly at least, but I understand bringing it here. What I'm going to do is treat the IP and the account as the same editor (which they really are) and consider the IP to have continued spamming after a final warning. I'm blocking the account indefinitely as a spam-only account, and blocking the IP for a week for spamming after a final warning. In theory, the indef block against the main account will probably block the IP anyway via autoblock, but I'm not taking that chance here. --  At am a  頭 01:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)