Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sharafuhere/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreation of Draft:Sudeep Karakkat by the IP and the draft was moved into mainspace by Npanel who was registered a few weeks after was blocked. GSS (talk |c|em ) 06:20, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Named account now blocked. IP edits too old. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The suspected sock was registered two days after was blocked and recreated their deleted article Sudeep Karakkat. Also adding the IP who posted the draft. GSS (talk |c|em ) 04:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I guess G5 may apply. GSS (talk |c|em ) 05:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Comment - This account was carefully "worked" to get through auto-confirmation by making innocuous edits. The account then sneaked an article under create-protection by case sensitivity.  This account obviously knows what they are doing.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

*The article is at AfD. I think it is G5able, but will await the SPI. This is an instance in which CU might be useful for me to have. Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 05:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If I read the tool right, the IP is a proxy (I'm shocked). Dloh cier ekim    (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked 209.182.233.100 as a proxy. Dloh cier ekim    (talk) 05:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . I'll also delete and salt the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreation of Sudeep Karakkat under Sudeep Karat to evade protection. The draft was created by the IP and it was moved to mainspace by the suspected sock. GSS (talk |c|em ) 09:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Can someone help me out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by K2share (talk • contribs) 07:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

@GSS @Dlohcierekim I understand the reason for my block and that i will not repeat the kind of edits for which i was blocked. Please Unblock me and close this investigations. please help me to merge my accounts. K2share (talk) 07:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Please Unblock me and Please give me a last chance. If you give me a chance i will contribute well written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, stable, and illustrated, where possible, by relevant images with suitable copyright licenses. i will not repeat the kind of edits for which i was blocked. K2share (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

- Per ipcheck the IP they're using is a proxy. Can you block on that? RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) 06:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
K2's admission & efforts to sabotage the SPI are conclusive behaviour, Please block K2share indef, & the IP for however long is appropriate for an IPv6. Cabayi (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC) There's a UTRS request pending at User talk:Sharafuhere Cabayi (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The IP is stale. I've K2share. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The IP is not a proxy and nothing on ipcheck indicates that it is. It belongs to a cellular provider according to whois. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Per IRC Help Request, this is their old account. Not edited in over 2 years though as they lost it but I'll log it so you're aware. RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) 07:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll provide logs if needed. RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) 07:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Logs have been sent. User has requested in them to delete Account. RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) 15:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Logs requested. Cabayi (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

In the logs K2share claims to be the author of: Both accounts are stale but the behavioural evidence is solid. Despite comments to about deleting accounts, K2share now seems keen on staying. In case they should remember the passwords to their old accounts, please block both socks indef. Cabayi (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * 10 Kalpanakal (created by User:Sharafaths, last edit Nov 2016)
 * Anil (film director) (created by User:Sharafathhere, last edit Nov 2012)
 * In cases like this where the accounts are clearly abandoned blocks won't accomplish much. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)