Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sharry99/Archive

Evidence submitted by Mokele
All of these accounts have already been banned as sockpuppets, but I'd like confirmation they're all from the same IP, to see if we can ban that IP from making new accounts. Each user has constantly and repeatedly attempted to introduce false and uncited information into WP articles, evading multiple bans with these numerous accounts. It's all there in the user contribs, I just need an IP to suggest for a block. Mokele (talk) 21:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
to see about any underlying IPs and to check for sleepers. –MuZemike 22:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * All from the same ranges, but they are too busy and too constructive to block the IPs. If the person can't be convinced to edit collaboratively, WP:RBI or if necessary ask for semi-protection of the articles. Amalthea  13:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Mokele
Even using the same name, and editing the same pages Mokele (talk) 00:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Tagged and blocked per WP:DUCK. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Mokele
Same damn edits, same ripping off copyrighted material, within 48 hours of last sockpuppet ban.

Seriously, sack up and ban the entire IP range, I'm getting sick of this moron. Mokele (talk) 19:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
This account is the same as. The range is too busy to block. TN X Man 15:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked; not sure we can do much else. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

25 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Yet another sockpupput of Sharry 99 - Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Sharry99 Mokele (talk) 02:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

08 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

History of Mugger crocodile shows that User:Naturalhistory99 is the latest of numerous editors who keep inserting the exact same information (along with the exact same unreliable source), originally starting with the now-blocked user Sharry99. Mr Fink (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Handled by. Elockid  ( Talk ) 23:03, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

15 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Making exact same dubious edits to Mugger crocodile as all of Sharry99's other sockpuppets. versus Sharry99's second to last sockpuppet Mr Fink (talk) 17:56, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Blatant duck, indef blocked - exactly the same MO as previous. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Account blocked, no other accounts found, marking for close. TN X Man 17:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)