Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sheldontechnology/Archive

07 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

They both quack like a duck, very similar edits to pages like Joe Paterno and all edits by both accounts are self-promoting. Users are blocked, just recording this, case ready for closing. 5 albert square (talk) 23:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Although responsible for some promotional fluff, Sheldontechnology was blocked for violating username policy. Returning under a new username which doesn't can never be considered sockpuppetry. WilliamH (talk) 00:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)


 * No, Sheldontechnology is subject to a spamusername block, not a username block. Returning under a new username to continue with the same spam as before most certainly can be considered sockpuppetry. 5 albert square is perfectly right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesBWatson (talk • contribs) 19:34, 8 August 2012 (UTC)