Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sheynhertz-Unbayg/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by Rodhullandemu)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)
 * (blocked by NawlinWiki)

Evidence submitted by Kusma
All the IPs and usernames behave the same way as community-banned User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg (and Barbara Staudinger admits to be him and complains about my reverts of SU socks). They have all been blocked by me during the last 2 days. The original ban discussion is here. The cleanup project that explains what to do with his edits is SU (it is inactive now, but was a large-scale effort after his ban). I don't know of any way to deal with Sheynhertz other than large-scale rangeblocks. Three years ago, I blocked all of these ranges: User:Kusma/Sheynhertz. On what ranges is Sheynhertz now? Can these ranges be blocked? Does anybody else use these ranges? How many socks are there that I missed? — Kusma talk 20:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I have asked ja:User:Los688, who just blocked some of Sheynhertz-Unbayg's sockpuppets on the Japanese Wikipedia, to comment on the situation. (Sheynhertz-Unbayg is Japanese and is also banned from the Japanese Wikipedia). — Kusma talk 16:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately Japanese Wikipedians don't really seem to know what to do, either: Los668's reply. — Kusma talk 17:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by — Kusma talk 20:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

MuZemike 20:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Found these accounts, all ✅, blocked, and tagged:
 * I'm also going to hardblock these ranges (most of his account creation is done on ja.wiki, so a softblock won't do any good):
 * 114.181.0.0/17
 * 114.183.0.0/17
 * 118.19.0.0/17
 * 121.117.128.0/17
 * 60.36.192.0/18
 * Hers fold  (t/a/c) 08:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm also going to hardblock these ranges (most of his account creation is done on ja.wiki, so a softblock won't do any good):
 * 114.181.0.0/17
 * 114.183.0.0/17
 * 118.19.0.0/17
 * 121.117.128.0/17
 * 60.36.192.0/18
 * Hers fold  (t/a/c) 08:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hers fold  (t/a/c) 08:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by HerkusMonte
the IP, like S-U and his socks located at Tokyo, appeared at Nikolaus von Üxküll-Gyllenband and added some categories as usually used by S-U. After a revert User:Rundmann came up and restored the IP edits. Rundmann is a newly created account and both the IP and Rundmann use a similar way to categorize articles (19th century people, X expatriates in Y, People of Y descent). HerkusMonte (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Michael Bednarek
Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Emptied page User:121.115.68.130, edit summary: "revert vandalism";
 * Replaced page User:Michael Bednarek with, edit summary: "This fool man will be a banned user, sockpuppet of evil, devil";
 * Replaced Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sheynhertz-Unbayg (this page) with db, edit summary: "no-meaning big insults";
 * Replaced page User talk:Michael Bednarek with #REDIRECT User:Michael Bednarek, edit summary: "This fool man will be a banned user, sockpuppet of evil, devil";
 * Replaced page User:Ezhiki with  , edit summary: "useless fool user, will banned";
 * Replaced page User talk:Ezhiki with #REDIRECT User:Ezhiki, edit summary: "useless fool user, banned"

After 1 day's rest, 121.115.68.130 is at it again, creating inappropriate entries on DAB pages, adding stub templates, overcategorising. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:16, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Bkonrad
began reverting edits made by shortly after that IP was flagged as a suspected sockpuppet. Displays the same pattern of comments and disregard for guidelines. older ≠ wiser 14:26, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by User:Voceditenore

 * User:Traudler shows same pattern of mulitple inappropriate DAB pages and revert warring over them, although is somewhat more responsive on his talk page than the others. Voceditenore (talk) 15:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The old accounts of Sheynhertz-Unbayg may be stale but Rundmann was editing up until 12 September 2010, Traudler up until 18 September, and Koczysz up until yesterday when he was blocked for vandalism and death threats. Given the past record, and the large amount of disruption caused by Koczysz, I would suggest a check-user to look for sleeper accounts linked to these three. Voceditenore (talk) 07:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

 * For WP:DUCK, see Special:Contributions/121.115.68.130; here's . -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Koczysz is indeffed by me after making death threats against other editors. Syrthiss (talk) 15:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
All of the accounts from the archive are. Any action would need to be directed by behavior, as checkuser will not link accounts to IPs. TN X Man 15:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC) The added accounts give me something to check against. ✅ the following accounts are the same:
 * No comment on the IP. TN X Man  15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What a sockfarm. . T. Canens (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And ✅. All accounts blocked and tagged. IP already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP. TN X Man  15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What a sockfarm. . T. Canens (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And ✅. All accounts blocked and tagged. IP already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP. TN X Man  15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What a sockfarm. . T. Canens (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And ✅. All accounts blocked and tagged. IP already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP. TN X Man  15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What a sockfarm. . T. Canens (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And ✅. All accounts blocked and tagged. IP already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What a sockfarm. . T. Canens (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And ✅. All accounts blocked and tagged. IP already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What a sockfarm. . T. Canens (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And ✅. All accounts blocked and tagged. IP already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What a sockfarm. . T. Canens (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And ✅. All accounts blocked and tagged. IP already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What a sockfarm. . T. Canens (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And ✅. All accounts blocked and tagged. IP already blocked. T. Canens (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Michael Bednarek
Special:Contributions/Quatrial – Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

 * I'd say WP:DUCK from a mile away. I'm torn between just rolling back his edits or letting it be. It's not all bad, but reviewing his every edit to filter out the mess takes too much time. – sgeureka t•c 07:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * I have a feeling there may be other accounts lying around. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * , but no sleepers. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  11:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Seems pretty likely, so I've blocked the account. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

12 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:DUCK:
 * Special:Contributions/114.180.231.166
 * of Fasching

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked two weeks, protected the article for a few days. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

30 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''


 * WP:DUCK:
 * Special:Contributions/121.117.218.43
 * of El-Baz

I blocked for 24 hours for three-revert violation, but based on the editing pattern this is pretty clearly yet another sock. older ≠ wiser 14:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

15 January 2011

 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''


 * WP:DUCK:
 * Special:Contributions/121.113.241.139
 * particularly and  (note the edit summary) at Franz Doppler

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

14 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same pattern of editing. Similar response to cleaning up edits to disambiguation pages older ≠ wiser 02:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP hasn't edited in nine days. Closing with no action taken. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

04 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''


 * Creation of peculiar name-related categories, with ongoing creation of similar categories after the initial one was deleted.
 * Category:Avian surnames -- Categories for discussion/Log/2011 February 18
 * Category:Animal surnames -- Categories for discussion/Log/2011 February 28
 * Category:Botanical surnames -- Categories for discussion/Log/2011 February 28
 * Category:Piscine surnames -- Categories for discussion/Log/2011 February 28

Submitted by older ≠ wiser 21:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' These were active during the 'avian surname' discussion a couple days ago. They must be socks of the above two.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

This IP must be linked too. It's going nuts adding to the 'botanical' and 'animal surname' cats. I noticed it keeps adding template:Expand German templates to its article creations.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Madness. I found this one searching through the newest article creations that used that German template. This account is brand new and heavily involved in those surname cats.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Per WP:DUCK. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * … and this frank e-mail:

To: Michael Bednarek <mb@...> Subject: Wikipedia e-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MediaWiki mailer From: Sheynhertz-Unbayg <j.milgromski@...> Message-Id: <E1Pwmrq-00072d-3n@srv277.pmtpa.wmnet> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:41:46 +0000 Shame and Death and this Czech waste. Morally bankrupt maggot, filthy scum, dirty son of bitches, rotten lunatic man. No one need you! Go ahead! No one need dictator like you. You are same fate with Ben-Ali, Qaddafi, Mubarak. http://www.youtube.com/user/Benbarzillay YosefYitzhak, meshorer, ger toshav tojruimaddu@... -- This e-mail was sent by user "Sheynhertz-Unbayg" on the English Wikipedia to user "Michael Bednarek". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents. The sender has not been given the recipient's email address, or any information about his/her e-mail account; and the recipient has no obligation to reply to this e-mail or take any other action that might disclose his/her identity. For further information on privacy, security, and replying, as well as abuse and removal from emailing, see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Email>.
 * -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Sad, really, that it is still impossible to talk to him if that involves any degree of criticism. Actually, I had hoped that somebody could talk to him sanely and make him keep to one permitted account. I don't think he'll listen to me, though, even though I wouldn't mind seeing him unblocked if he manages to agree to some kind of mentorship -- and finds a mentor. (Disclosure: I am the original blocking admin). —Кузьма討論 06:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked below. DQ.alt (t) (e)    17:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

28 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Similar edits to Sheynhertz-Unbayg. Geschichte (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Here's another one, clearly Sheynhertz. —Кузьма討論 05:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC) +1 more duck. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Similar edits to : – Ajltalk 09:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are the same: Group 2
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 is a match to the first bunch.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

All blocked and tagged. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 00:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

30 March 2011 (re-opened 02 April 2011)

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Similar edits to Adelranz (see IP's contribs) – Ajltalk 21:31, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both IPs blocked 2 weeks for evasion. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

05 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Special:Contributions/220.220.195.80 – WP:DUCK; see also WHOIS. Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked 1 month for evasion. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:34, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

07 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:DUCK, WHOIS, contributions;
 * edit summary,
 * edit summary,
 * edit summary,
 * compare with earlier case regarding.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Added another account, Beweger, with same pattern. older ≠ wiser 12:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No comment on the IPs, but the following are ✅ matches to each other:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. T. Canens (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. T. Canens (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. T. Canens (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. T. Canens (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. T. Canens (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. T. Canens (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

08 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:DUCK

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Here's one more (already blocked):

A note: Just blocking the accounts without actually deleting / reverting the edits / cleaning up the pages does not achieve anything useful. He just moves to a new account (I think he creates them on other language Wikipedias anyway) and continues. Is there something that can be done other than rangeblocking all of Japan? —Кузьма討論 06:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:DUCK: (already blocked, adding here for reference):
 * – Ajltalk 08:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Another blocked IP:
 * More:
 * (Clear WP:DUCK). —Кузьма討論 09:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And discussion on the IP's talk page. I would appreciate the help of people with better communication skills than me on that page. —Кузьма討論 09:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And discussion on the IP's talk page. I would appreciate the help of people with better communication skills than me on that page. —Кузьма討論 09:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Michael Bednarek (talk) 15:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Michael Bednarek (talk) 16:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * , particularly edit summary

Michael Bednarek (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Michael Bednarek (talk) 16:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅:
 * No other sleepers though. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Boy, this guy hops IPs like a madman. ✅ these as well:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

All accounts blocked and tagged. IP listed in suspected socks is autoblocked. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 19:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

10 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''


 * WP:DUCK, WHOIS, contributions Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)


 * User talk:JMargulies -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:00, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both IPs have been blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

18 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * More socks, blocked by Kusma


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK for Al.Sparsky By chance has he done Italian related pages in the past? the 125 IP comes from same country as past sockpuppets and is doing similar things. Off to fix 100 or so articles. Oh joy. Bgwhite (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC) Bgwhite (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Added some more. I have cleaned up some of the mess, but not everything. Probably the only thing that helps is a rangeblock, as has been done at least twice before already. —Кузьма討論 10:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Currently finding ranges. From what I can tell you, they look promising. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid (Alternate)</b> ( Talk ) 12:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * These are currently the active ranges they are editing. It seems possible for a long-term block here. They seem to be the only person editing from these ranges, some for almost 2 years exclusively.


 * 58.93.160.0/19
 * 60.35.0.0/19
 * 60.36.246.0/23
 * 114.180.0.0/19
 * 114.180.228.0/19
 * 114.181.0.0/20
 * 114.181.48.0/20
 * 118.21.80.0/20
 * 121.115.64.0/19
 * 121.115.224.0/22
 * 121.116.192.0/18
 * 121.117.160.0/19
 * 121.117.208.0/20
 * 125.202.240.0/20
 * 125.205.192.0/22


 * I'll get to blocking these unless another admin does so. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid (Alternate)</b> ( Talk ) 13:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Also self endorsing for a sleeper check. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid (Alternate)</b> ( Talk ) 14:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Without commenting on any IPs, the following are ✅ matches:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Could I get a collateral damage check for a hardblock on the ranges above? See archives for reason. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 19:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

I've blocked and tagged all the accounts. In the meanwhile, I've softblock all the ranges above to help with some of IP sockpuppetry. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 19:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't know where to report this. It is back as 58.93.165.73 and changing articles that were restored yesterday. Bgwhite (talk) 07:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * 58.93.160.0/19 rangeblocked 1 month. Please continue to report socks as you see them. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 11:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I think we're done for now; closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Is this appropriate? Has Elockid's request for a collateral damage check been fulfilled? – Ajltalk 04:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bring this to attention, Ajl772. :) After doing a bit of digging around, it seems that all Elockid's blocks were anon only, so they shouldn't effect logged in users. Users wishing to create accounts from those ranges can do so via ACC, which is suggested in Elockid's block summaries. Therefore there's no need for a CU to check for collateral, as the only collateral effect that any of the blocks will have will be on anons trying to edit from the ranges, and they can go through ACC. There also doesn't seem to be a lot of legitimate editors on those ranges, just from briefly looking at edits from a few of them. (PS: just as a short closing statement, all the ranges above have been blocked (except from 114.180.228.0/19, which is pretty much redundant to 114.180.0.0/19)). Kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 07:49, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The point of a collateral damage check was (I think) to move back to a hardblock, as was done several times before (see the archives). In previous years (the problem goes back to 2006), SU used to do most of his account creation on jawiki, so softblocks here did no good.


 * Anyway, if we can't get a collateral damage check done, I guess the best thing to do is just wait and see if he starts editing again (my usual checks for his activity have been negative for the last couple of days) and then just hardblock all the currently-softblocked ranges (we'll see the collateral damage as unblock requests then, if there is any). It is just awfully stupid work, and without checkuser assistance, it is a bit like stabbing in the dark, and I'm rather tired of this user after more than 4 years of this. —Кузьма討論 08:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A CU was preformed after the soft blocks were placed to catch sleepers on those ranges, so unless he does create the accounts on a different wiki then we shouldn't see any issues for a while now. In the event that he does that, I suggest getting in touch with a steward. I'm also sure that if you refiled an SPI (or quick SPI) after continued disruption then a CU would be more than happy to look into the possibility of a hard block. Best, SpitfireTally-ho! 18:28, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

01 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

He is back. IP is from Japan and doing the usual editing. Bgwhite (talk) 20:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
114.183.48.0/20 blocked 3 months. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 20:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ that the following are the same (no comment on the IP):


 * IP block hardened. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  20:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * IP block hardened. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  20:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * IP block hardened. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  20:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * IP block hardened. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  20:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * IP block hardened. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  20:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * IP block hardened. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  20:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * All blocked and tagged. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 20:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

10 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

He is back... IP from Japan and making similar edits as before Bgwhite (talk) 08:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Found another username, will see if there is more. —Кузьма討論 09:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No comment on the IPs, but the following are ✅ matches:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The confirmed accounts are already blocked, but I blocked the 60.36 IP for awhile. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The confirmed accounts are already blocked, but I blocked the 60.36 IP for awhile. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The confirmed accounts are already blocked, but I blocked the 60.36 IP for awhile. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

12 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

See recent editing history; readding information previously added by confirmed sock only a day earlier. A fairly obvious WP:DUCK.  elektrik SHOOS  05:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

From what I can see using just non-checkuser tools, the ranges 60.36.0.0/16 and 60.35.0.0/16 seem to not have been used by anyone but Sheynhertz in the last two years. If this is more or less correct, I'd like to block them for a while. —Кузьма討論 07:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Endorsing for sleepers, I suppose. Kusma, those ranges are really wide, so I've blocked 60.36.224.0/19 for 1 month. Unfortunately I can't do better than 60.35.0.0/16, so I've blocked that for a month as well. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No sleepers that I saw. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I know these ranges are rather wide, so I wasn't comfortable doing anything without asking here first. —Кузьма討論 15:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

20 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Special:Contributions/121.117.181.246 – WP:DUCK Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * We've seen this sort of IP used before in this case. Blocked 1 month. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

20 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK Just appeared. Suggest looking for sleepers. Voceditenore (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * +1. —Кузьма討論 14:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Added 58.93.186.164 to the list. Bgwhite (talk) 21:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * He is still creating new accounts. User:Stifters has just popped up.  Spent an hour in damage control earlier, back I go to do some more. Bgwhite (talk) 06:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I deleted/reverted everything Stifters did. No time to work on the others. —Кузьма討論 08:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Boy, looked like Stifters was busy after my last report. Thank you Kusma for undoing all of his latest work.  ~60 talk pages reverted 3 times today.  Oh Joy. Bgwhite (talk) 08:38, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Can't something be done to prevent more damage via edit filters instead of SPIs after the damage? Given the obsessive nature of this editor and their ever-increasing proliferation of sockpuppets, dozens of them in the last two months, this is taking up enormous amounts of editors' time. Voceditenore (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * to see what's going on with these accounts. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:06, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

All registered accounts are ✅ as Sheynhertz-Unbayg. I have hardblocked a couple of IP ranges, but that may not do much, as this person encompasses an entire /12 range. No comment with regard to the above-reported IP addresses. –MuZemike 17:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * All the confirmed accounts are blocked and tagged; I went ahead and blocked the rest of the IPs. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

25 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Mass reverting Kusma, recreated categories that S-U has made in the past. I blocked and nuked. Syrthiss (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It is clear that this is Sheynhertz. I have blocked 121.117.160.0/19 for 3 months, and expect to hit only him. Also added another 2 usernames.
 * I would love to see a better approach than just rangeblocks and mass reverts/deletions (blocking without deletion has no effect on him, he abandons his account after a few days anyway). No matter how much he insults me, if anybody manages to talk him into editing collaboratively, at a reasonable rate and without making huge amounts of work for or requests for work of others, I wouldn't even mind seeing him unbanned. —Кузьма討論 19:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * +1 IP, wouldn't be surprised if there are other socks on that range. —Кузьма討論 11:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * How much damage would a hardblock on that range do and sleepers? -- DQ  (t)   (e)  20:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * All ✅, plus . An IP block is not possible. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  13:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The first three were already blocked and tagged; I blocked the fourth one TNX found. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

04 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Sleeper check please. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 15:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Aye. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:55, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. Dominic·t 02:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Tagged the account. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

07 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:duck Bgwhite (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I've also added one above that I caught over at Special:NewPages.  elektrik SHOOS  15:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Mauerei blocked. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 18:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Self-endorsing to see if anything else is lurking around. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 18:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Elockid already blocked, so we're done. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Szolics has already been blocked, so no further action required. Steven Zhang  <sup style="color:#FFCC00;">The clock is ticking....  22:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

14 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK. Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, along with and. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

All blocked and tagged. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 14:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

01 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

More of the same. Already blocked and tagged, but need a CU for a sleeper check and if possible an IP block. I would also appreciate if a CU could do a nice, full sweep on the ranges listed at User:Elockid/Notes (IP ranges). The symbol (N) means not blocked yet. M.Magruc managed to circumvent detection last check and this account, circumvented numerous checks and was only found when I asked a CU if I could hardblock 2 of the ranges they have been to be using. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 13:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are the same:
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I swept the IPs, but I think the problem here is that one of the ranges used is an /11, which makes it hard to check and much harder to block effectively. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. All handled. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 14:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

13 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The usual. Sleeper check please. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 18:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sure. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Technical evidence is in-line with previous confirmed socks of Sheynhertz-Unbayg. -- Avi (talk) 20:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Elo already blocked, so we're done. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:07, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

06 October 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

An old account that has sprung to life in the past couple of days. Creating and working on disambiguation pages, quack. Working on Jewish pages, quack. Bgwhite (talk) 06:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC) Bgwhite (talk) 06:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are matches to each other and matches to accounts in the archive:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Both blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Both blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

11 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

An older account that's working in the same areas that Sheynhertz-Unbayg was known to work in. WP:DUCK may apply here. However, since the account's contributions are largely positive, I don't want to unduly assume bad faith. Nonetheless, it's something worth investigating. <font color="#FFCC66">elektrik <font color="#666666">SHOOS  (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This and this looks very much like SU, plus his bad English. I call WP:DUCK. – sgeureka t•c 16:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ plus the following (I've already blocked and tagged them): Also. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 16:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

13 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The bulk of user's edits appear to be reverting rollbacks of User:Shalshelet's changes.

Examples:



. Given the number of recently-blocked socks, I think it's time to see if there are even more of them. <span style='font:1.0em "Apple Garamond","Adobe Garamond Pro",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'>Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

. I can't think of many reasons why a new user would spend all of their time only reverting reversions of a banned user. I've tagged the new pages they created to replace the ones previously deleted under G5. <font color="#FFCC66">elektrik <font color="#666666">SHOOS  (talk) 01:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅. No other accounts found. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 01:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet blocked and tagged. Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  01:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

16 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both brought to my attention by User:Dougweller. WP:DUCK (new editor, Jewish-German surnames, redirects), likely linked to the (now archived) 11 June 2012 sock report. – sgeureka t•c 15:14, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Both ✅ and blocked/tagged. Also,. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 15:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

20 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Another potential SU sock, based on behavioral evidence. Worth at least checking up on. <font color="#FFCC66">elektrik <font color="#666666">SHOOS  (talk) 01:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Addendum: it's definitely Sheynhertz-Unbayg based on behavior alone. Should also check for sleepers. <font color="#FFCC66">elektrik <font color="#666666">SHOOS  (talk) 01:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Can you please provide diffs or other evidence? Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  01:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Just look at his contributions. It's textbook SU behavior: redirect stubs, addition of unnecessary tags, text copied from the German Wikipedia. <font color="#FFCC66">elektrik <font color="#666666">SHOOS  (talk) 01:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Definitely him. Blocked indef. . <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 02:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

22 October 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See typical behaviors at long-term abuse case. Only two edits are to a page within their usual topic range and SU's LTA page. The address also geolocates to Japan (again, see the LTA case). Requesting checkuser as it may also be useful to check for sleepers.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * T. Canens (talk) 05:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * This IP doesn't appear related to the master based on his article edits, which consist of adding a sole interwiki rather than adding poorly-translated German texts. Closing as no action taken. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:08, 25 October 2012 (UTC)