Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shez 15/Archive

28 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

This user's history goes a long time back, and while being active he was known for his fan-led edits on the Rani Mukerji article. Now, just when he's back out of nowhere after a long time, a new account (Jamiawala) is created and he/she keeps the same kind of glrofication and POV editing on that article. I'm almost sure these two accounts belong to the same person. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  17:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I have a feeling Jamiawala is Dr.Mukesh111, so I've added that account to the case. We'll see what the SPI results say. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Jamiawala turned out to be ❌. I'm not wholly convinced that these two accounts are the same, though; Shez 15 has edited a bunch of other articles, whereas Jamiawala is a single purpose account. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Per another case I've protected Rani Mukerji for awhile. Since these two accounts are unrelated, I'm closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I've blocked Jamiawala - it's clear that they're here to cause disruption, and my gut is telling me this isn't their first time. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

06 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Just like the vandal, who was blocked, this clearly is another sock. He does practically the same edits, and edits the same articles with a clear agenda. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  21:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This administrator named Shahid has been utterly irresponsible in his behaviour. He has vandalized the article of 'Rani Mukerji' using stray critical comments and using them inappropriately. His history is dubious too. His article on Preity Zinta is meant for a fansite. All critical commentary is deleted and some praise is exaggerated to glorify. He created a page named ' Godfrey Phillips National Bravery Awards', which is a random unimportant award, just to glorify the woman.

I also suspect he is close to the woman 'Preity Zinta'. Thus neutrality of the article cant be assured.

I hope you guys take note and prevent this guy from damaging wikipedia's credibility —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollywood shollywood (talk • contribs) 10:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, what then should one say about you in regard to this edit? And assuming that you are Jamiawala (which most probably you are), this edit as well? Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  14:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I also have strong suspicion that Shahid(the guy above) is also on the payroll of Ms. Zinta. I believe that the neutrality of the article on her is under dispute. I hope that this guy is blocked from making edits to that article and the article be given for correction to other administrators who can do some damage control. I hope strong action is taken in this regard. Corruption of this kind should not be tolerated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollywood shollywood (talk • contribs) 14:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are the same:
 * TN X Man 15:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked by admin/Tagged -- DQ  (t)   (e)  21:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked by admin/Tagged -- DQ  (t)   (e)  21:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

12 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Very similar edits, the same agenda. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  20:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked 1 week. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * should we not hit the master for being the third time socking? Or am I missing something? -- DQ  (t)   (e)  16:39, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I guess so, though the master hasn't edited in a few weeks. I've blocked them for a week. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:54, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

18 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Clearly the same person, with the same edits and the same intent. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  04:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Named account ✅ as being the same as Shez 15. No comment on the IP. TN X Man 13:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * But it's clearly the same person, considering WP:DUCK, is it not? Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  13:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged the sock; blocked the master 1 month for continued puppetry. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

24 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Similar edits. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  20:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Endorsing for confirmation for the named account; there'll be no response on the IP. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the named account is a match. TN X Man  14:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sigh. Alright, I've blocked and tagged the sock. The autoblock has kicked in for the IP, so that can be left alone for now. And since Shez insists on continued sockpuppetry, I've indefinitely blocked their account. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

27 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Shez used to edit the Koffee with Karan page very often and his uniquely incorrect way of formatting citations makes it almost clear to me that it is indeed him, though I may be wrong. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  23:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Actually, I think this may be Dr.Mukesh111. I'm endorsing for a check against Shez 15 and, the latter of whom was previously confirmed as Dr.Mukesh. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ match to . I'm sorry, HelloAnnyong, but it looks like you missed this one, but you do get to choose from our wonderful consolation prizes! Johnny, tell him what they are! TN X Man  13:17, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll take this small one that includes a block and tag for the sock. (Sorry, my clever response center is offline right now...) —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

31 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

A clear sock (he even admits it in his first edit summary on Koffee with Karan) Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  06:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked/Taggged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  12:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

01 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

The first one is a clear sock. The others make some very similar edits. Actually, the same edits on Filmfare Award for Best Actress. All edits revolve around the same. All accounts created today. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  12:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Endorsing for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following are the same and a match to :
 * appears ❌. TN X Man  13:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * First, I've blocked and tagged the three confirmed. As to the fourth, I think they really are unrelated. These two edits, and these two, were made at exactly the same time. I guess it's possible to sock at exactly the same time, but.. yeah. Anyway, closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * appears ❌. TN X Man  13:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * First, I've blocked and tagged the three confirmed. As to the fourth, I think they really are unrelated. These two edits, and these two, were made at exactly the same time. I guess it's possible to sock at exactly the same time, but.. yeah. Anyway, closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * First, I've blocked and tagged the three confirmed. As to the fourth, I think they really are unrelated. These two edits, and these two, were made at exactly the same time. I guess it's possible to sock at exactly the same time, but.. yeah. Anyway, closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

09 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Similar edits on Bollywood award pages, clearly not new to Wikipedia. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  22:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

16 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Orange Model Management was first created 6 January 2007 by indef blocked User:Orangemodel and was deleted 31 May 2011
 * Orange Model Agency was recreated 31 May 2011 by  Ysl dg2
 * Orange Model Management was recreated again 9 June 2011 by Geenadavis32 and is an exact copy  of the version created by Ysl dg2
 * User Ysl dg2 has been blocked as a sockpuppet of Shez 15 who was blocked 26 May 2011 for socking.
 * Creation of Orange Model  Agency  is the only contribution by Geenadavis32
 * Possible block evasion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

(adding Sourabhlila:) His two edits make it almost clear. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  13:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK, and I've deleted the article. It's been awhile, so I'll endorse for sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

✅ plus:



–MuZemike 19:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Sourabhlila seems ❌. –MuZemike 19:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

11 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The same edits on the Rani Mukerji award page. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  10:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Adding a CU for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sourabhlila was already checked (see archive). Madzfan also appears ❌. TN X Man  14:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That sounds weird because the user has just reverted the article to a previous version and is clearly not new to Wikipedia, seeing his summary. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  15:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I'm overriding the checkuser on this. Madzfan is clearly not a new editor, so I've blocked on behavioral groudns. Sourabhlila hasn't edited in the past month, so I'll leave it alone for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

01 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obsession with changing Rani Mukerji article and going after another editor. See comments here, and latest massive edit here. BollyJeff ||  talk  01:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
case was not filed properly, it is fixed now. Alexandria  (talk)  02:23, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I've blocked 142.157.116.0/25 for two weeks. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:45, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

01 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The same edits of POV and glorification on articles related to Rani Mukerji - I'm sure the IP starts with either 142.. or 119.. - the article was protected because of him, but he keeps the same track. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  10:53, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Thedirtypicture and Shahidsass are ✅ matches to each other and likely Shez 15 socks. TN X Man 18:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * was a sleeper? Alexandria   (talk)  18:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears so. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  18:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * blocked and tagged then, closing. Alexandria   (talk)  18:33, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

23 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Now, I just suspect though I'm not sure, but I think a check can solve it all. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  08:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Please explain why you think this is a sock of Shez 15, using diffs if necessary. WilliamH (talk) 15:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes you are right. His recent edits on Rani Mukerji are quite similar to the edits of the last socks of Shez 15 (basically a lot of POV pushing and fancraft) who were blocked and who are the reason for the page's recent protection. Again, I'm not sure he is a sock (usually I am) and I really hope he is not, but I think a check is necessary. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  15:11, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup, the edits are similar indeed. However this account is ❌. WilliamH (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  15:41, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

31 January 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All of them maintain the same kind of Rani Mukerji fanaticism. The third IP is almost certainly his, because I remember him evading his blocks with an account that has a similar beginning. If you notice, all the involved IPs and user accounts I've added edit the Filmfare Awards page as well as Rani Mukerji's awards page. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  06:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
There's not a lot I can tell you here. The last confirmed account from the archive is. The two named accounts here are ❌ to each other and I have no comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * And they are not related to the IPs either? And there's another user,, who I suspect (in fact, am quite sure) is a sock. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  17:47, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Those IPs are located all across the globe, so we could be looking at some form of meatpuppetry. Anyway, I don't really see a lot of justification for blocks here, but list at RFPP (or here) if the articles need to be protected. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

07 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I really hope something can be done to find out whether those are socks of Shez 15 (which I'm pretty sure of). The accounts are all new to Wikipedia, their edits are related to one subject - Rani Mukerji - and in a usual fanatic kind of way, which I'm getting tired of reverting. The IP is easily recognisable as a sock for me because among other IP ranges, Shez often used one which starts with "142..." (and they also go to film articles where the actress appears, changing cast order to give her top billing). One common thing to most of the suspected socks is their recent edits on the Filmfare Best Actress page (see here), where they added false information in regard to award superlatives to include their favourite actress. The page was once protected because of that. I think at least they finding that they are related to each other could help us stop this fanatic disease. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  07:49, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The technical data isn't a lot of help here. Whitneyhoustanfanforever and Jayafan are connections. Dolphin2687 and Forever freind2 are connections to each other, but are ❌ to the first two. Tusshar420 is a / match to the last two. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you - waiting for admin action - there are two more (new accounts today) which work only on Rani Mukerji (in a fan-led kind of way which I'm sure is Shez 15, but it already is WP:DUCK, I believe, anyway):, . Could they be checked? I think they belong to the same person, and I'm quite sure to those mentioned above (their IP range must be starting with 142...). Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  08:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Nandinsethi is a ✅ match to Whitneyhoustanfanforever. Yahoogoogle is a match to those two accounts.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Now here's another one - . Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  09:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh, for the love of ... the following are ✅ indistinguishable based on technical evidence:

I'd say it's (borderline confirmed) that they are the same as Whitneyhoustanfanforever.

As you may have guessed some of them edit on a shared IP so it's not easy to make any definitive statements here without great risk of false positives. Amalthea 14:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged the confirmed for now, but I can't look over evidence right now. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  07:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok so this is a mess just making my head hurt, so to sum it all up...
 * ✅. to :
 * ✅. to the above group:
 * and individually are  to
 * and are  to each other, ❌ to
 * is / to and.
 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * and individually are  to
 * and are  to each other, ❌ to
 * is / to and.
 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * is my connection to Shez 15 per ips in the archives. Also Whitneyhoustanfanforever pulling some similiar comments to accounts/ips in the archive. So i'm going to sum the first two groups as Shez 15. Now for the last two rows, except Whitneyhoustanfanforever, they could be DUCK'd per some diffs, but I want a second opinion on them. No clue where Jayafan fits into this. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:39, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Can't give any more help since they haven't made further edits. But I wouldn't worry about it too much, if they return to active editing we can still pick it up again. Amalthea  11:50, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Closing, per Amalthea. Since these accounts aren't active right now, I don't really see the point of doing a detailed contribution analysis. T. Canens (talk) 09:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

17 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The user (Shez 15) has been notorious for sock-puppetry on the Rani Mukerji page for years now. And several of his/her accounts have been blocked in the past as can be seen here. Of late, he/she has most likely targeted the article again in a similar manner by pushing their agenda of removing sourced information that hints at a decline in her career. Some of these newly created accounts are: this, this, this, and this. All of these accounts have been created with the sole purpose of pushing their agenda on Mukerji's main article and the filmography page. They have all been repeatedly trying to include her award wins in the filmography table, something that is against the policy for Bollywood actors. It's clear from the contributions of these accounts that they are handled by the same user. Another singular aspect of Shez's account was his/her desire to list Mukerji's name first in the cast order of her films. That can be seen in this diff.  kri muk  90 12:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Excuse me! I am just working to improve her page. And I credit the film pages as per credits seen in the actual movie. Clearly, if you watch Yuva, the credits go as such: Ajay, Rani and then Abhishek. I don't need to justify myself to you. All I did was build on Wikipedia but I see that you just don't want the page to improve which is too bad. Don't keep the awards like on Cate Blanchett's page. And why should Hollywood actors get all the awards mention and not Bollywood actors? They are not any better than Bollywood actors. At the end of the day, they are just actors. And each actor's page should be similar formatting if the work is done.

Well not everyone wants to do the work and fill in all those awards. So it's fine if you're lazy. Just say that. But I'm not demanding everyone to follow this format. But since Rai and now Mukerji's filmography was worked on beautifully, why do you want to just scratch that away? Forget bollywood or hollywood, this is the best organization each performance for any actor can get for their work. I hope you change your mind because you might stick to this format now but I know how fast things on wikipedia change so if this is to be done three years later, better to keep all my hard work then have someone else start from scratch. And do you have any good reason as to why it shouldn't be kept? None. Stop comparing formats Bollywood vs. Hollywood. I only see Mukerji as an actor first and any actor would like their performances in their filmography to be validated. See Cate Blanchett page, it's beautiful work. All the information I need is in her filmography. Thanks! Do consider all points instead of having a pre-formed opinion about this. Be open-minded. That's all I ask. Also, you can add this better reference for the Malaysia concert as the show happened today instead of having no details from the old reference once protection is taken off the page: http://www.ibtimes.co.in/articles/539074/20140217/shahrukh-madhuri-rani-mukherjee-temptation-reloaded-photos.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tumbin14 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 17 February 2014‎ (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - The editing history on Rani Mukerji suggests that these accounts are all related but I'd like a CU opinion first. Everything in the archive is stale so won't be able to get a link to Shex 15. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The following are all ✅ to one another, but as noted above, a technical connection to the master is :
 * DevdasHum is ❌ to the above. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The confirmed group of accounts have all been tagged and blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * DevdasHum is ❌ to the above. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The confirmed group of accounts have all been tagged and blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * DevdasHum is ❌ to the above. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The confirmed group of accounts have all been tagged and blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * DevdasHum is ❌ to the above. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The confirmed group of accounts have all been tagged and blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The confirmed group of accounts have all been tagged and blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

02 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User Tumbin14 was blocked recently for using multiple accounts, see [here]. According to his/her contributions, it can be seen that they were hell bent on including Mukerji's awards and nominations to her filmography table against consesus. Now, an IP user is back to make similar requests here. Clearly a sock, something he/she has admitted in this comment. KRIMUK  90  ✉  07:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked. Closing now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)