Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shobi136/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Alright, here goes:

On 00:57, 11 June 2016, the alleged master created Ayesha Nazir Jatt, which was CSD'd. Refaahmed was created 08:42, 11 June 2016, and recreated the article 20 minutes after. It was CSD'd again, and Refaahmed contested deletion, and then requested undeletion. The article then went to AFD. Both editors appear to be SPAs.

Fatimahnazirjatt was created 10:30, 12 June 2016, then created Fatimahnazirahmedjatt a minute after that. RamishAsgharPTI was created 05:48, 10 June 2016. They all then went to tinker around the AFD page, contest deletion, etc.:. The timing of the article's recreation, account creations, and various other activity is suspicious, as noted. Requesting CU to analyze the connection between these accounts, as I am fairly sure that they are either socks or friends. Thank you! GABgab 15:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: RamishAsgharPTI also created the page. Salt, maybe? GABgab 21:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm convinced that Shobi136 is almost surely meat (per this), and concur that they should be blocked. GABgab 23:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Good catch. I assumed it was WP:Meatpuppetry, but the CU should clear things up. Thanks, OnionRing (talk) 15:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi onion ring..


 * this is my first account in wiki and please check where the accounts of refaahmed, fatimahnazirjatt and ramishasgharPTI were created from or where did they do chances from. All these accounts belong to different individuals in different countries! I dont even know who is ramishasgharPTI or Shobi136! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Refaahmed (talk • contribs) 15:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)  Moved from User talk:OnionRing. GABgab 15:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * How would you know that they're in different countries if you don't know who the owners are? KSF  T C 00:28, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Chances are that is meat as opposed to a sock, but has not edited since June so there's little point in blocking them now. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC).
 * - Per the page creation, contested deletion, and diffs, please check the master and all four suspected puppets. Thanks. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like and I conflicted (I was using the clerk script and that doesn't display conflicts), I've reset it to "checking". Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:20, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * The following accounts are to each other and the above two accounts:
 * is ❌.
 * I've blocked the two confirmed accounts without tags. To the extent the "possible" accounts are not socks, I strongly believe they are meat and should be blocked. Although Refaahmed is unrelated, based on their comments here, which are unusual, I would not be surprised if they were meat as well.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The two possibles are .  Mini  apolis  22:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * is ❌.
 * I've blocked the two confirmed accounts without tags. To the extent the "possible" accounts are not socks, I strongly believe they are meat and should be blocked. Although Refaahmed is unrelated, based on their comments here, which are unusual, I would not be surprised if they were meat as well.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The two possibles are .  Mini  apolis  22:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The two possibles are .  Mini  apolis  22:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)