Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shrike/Archive

16 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

The first edit by User:Banu hoshech was, identical to the same edits continuously made by shrike      ...and on for many years , and considering he even reverts spelling fixes and grammar just like shrike, something very odd to do, I doubt he is someone new. Shrike was officially notified of WP:ARBPIA earlier today, and had he made the change with the account named shrike, he would have broken 1RR. The hebrew related name of the puppet also indicates relation to the Israeli user shrike. Passionless  -Talk  01:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * for a check to compare the two named accounts, per & . Regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 09:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * What a mess. These users are all over the place when it comes to IPs, and some are dynamic mobile ranges. Because of this, it's hard to connect the two accounts, making it . As for, they share the same IP range and UA as blocked user . Tiptoety  talk 16:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that's a false positive with OSUHEY; the behaviors are pretty different. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged the sock on behavioral evidence. If Shrike broke any restrictions on their editing, take it to AE. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

19 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Requesting help with investigation. History over at Dhimmitude is a mess, and Shrike is under a sanction to not edit while logged out or with another account. See this, which is an AN3 report, being edit-warred over. - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 10:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * There is edit-warring there, and I see that there's already a SPI case against Frotz (one of the editors on that page). Withdrawing request, as it seems I have the wrong grouping of users. - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 09:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This utter nonsense and frivolous my account is 5 years old and topic of interest in entirely different then frotz as evident from our contributions yes I met user user:frotz in dhimmitude article and agree with him on some issues but that about it.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 11:09, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Clearly I know I'm not a sock of Shrike or vice versa nor am I tagteaming with anyone. How am I to convince you of this? Must I out myself? -- Frotz(talk) 12:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm not seeing anything indicating sockpuppetry off the bat, and I'm going to need quite a bit to run a check or to block these users. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  02:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)