Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Siamfootball/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Nflfanatic123 picked up editing almost immediately after Siamfootball was blocked, creating the exact same kind of Thai football biography substubs. Paul_012 (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . ST47 (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * . ST47 (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * . ST47 (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * . ST47 (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * . ST47 (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * . ST47 (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

recreated some articles originally created by. An investigation into their edits using the editor interaction analyser showed a massive overlap in interactions. Yamla (talk) 12:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ sockpuppetry. was discovered as a sleeper. No other sleepers discovered. Accounts blocked and tagged, all that remains is to archive this investigation. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreates myriad previously deleted stubs about Thai footballers written by past socks. See, e.g., Chainarong Boonkerd, Woradorn Uun-ard, Noppol Kerdkaew, Saksit Jitwichan, Phitak Phimpae. The editor interaction tool makes it obvious that these users are the same:. Given the glaring similarities to past socks, I think a behavioral block would be warranted. The previous accounts are stale, but CU has previously found sleepers, so a check might be warranted nonetheless. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I've encountered this user while patrolling new pages and I was about to come and report the same user. . — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - probably a nice easy one for a new CU (even if it is for comparison), make sure you've got the recommended scripts then ping me? ~TNT (she/her • talk) 13:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * This one could be more tricky than I thought! ~TNT (she/her • talk) 13:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * - ~TheresNoTime (to chat) 16:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ~TheresNoTime (to chat) 16:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked on behavioural evidence only (thanks for the nudge ) ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 21:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This account was created just weeks after the most recent sock was blocked. As before, it takes a near-exclusive interest in Thai football, and the editor interaction tool yields scores of results despite the fact that the account has relatively few edits (see ). The pattern of recreating previous socks' creations also continues, but Emperorxijin is seemingly more clever than previous iterations: the titles have been slightly modified, so, for instance, Anusorn Jaiphet has been recreated at Anuson Jaiphet, Muhammadnasay Kolaeh has been recreated at Muhammadnasay Kolae, Noppol Kerdkaew has been recreated at Noppon Kerdkaew, and Phitak Phimpae has been recreated at Phitak Pimpae. The chance of making that many "typos" innocently is approximately zero. (Sigh.) CU will be stale, but I think there's ample evidence for a behavioral block; I'd recommend a sleeper check since it's been useful in the past. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . - For sleeper check, given the archive and that one hasn't been run in some time. --Jack Frost (talk) 08:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The old accounts are stale, but from what I see in the CU logs, this is very likely to be them. Confirmed to . Will block and tag. Girth Summit  (blether)  09:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)