Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Silverlife/Archive

Report date January 12 2010, 16:36 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Uon being told he couldn't have attacking userboxes a admin has removed 2x's now a anon ip is trying to add again. If proven to be Silverlife I request the block as per Tan. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

– Behavioral evidence clearly indicates that the IP is Silverlife. No CU necessary. –MuZemike 03:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

IP blocked 24h. User:Silverlife semi-protected. –MuZemike 03:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Evidence submitted by Five Ton Sockpuppet
Hello there, Don the Sockpuppet is here with a SPI request because he saw a thread in ANI that recommended Joe Chill to bring this into SPI.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Five Ton Sockpuppet (talk) 01:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

– Plaxico is calling... –MuZemike 01:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Five Ton Sockpuppet is Pickbothmanlol. Dominic·t 02:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What about RegularBreaker? Joe Chill (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

The above CU request was not for the pickbothmanlol sock, but silverlife.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs 11:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

– CU not necessary with regards to the reported accounts. –MuZemike 06:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

It has been known for a while that RegularBreaker was Silverlife (look at Silverlife's userpage history). Why wasn't this user already blocked? Is there some discussion that none of us know about that we should? –MuZemike 06:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC)


 * A user suggested it in ANI because the user said that he might have pretended to be RegularBreaker. I don't agree with that, but I didn't want to start anything. Joe Chill (talk) 07:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've blocked RegularBreaker. Quack all he wants in protest, but this is clearly the same person and as MuZemike has implied, it's not worth a CU's time to check. --  At am a  頭 21:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)