Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SirShill/Archive

01 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

I'll just take a bit of what I've got. 84.55.67.145 here asks for feedback to his mail. The only person with that name in Sweden resides at the same address as Åsk, the owner of Adland. SirShill adds Åsk here on a list on svwp and adds a picture of the house Åsk lives in. Aaskw adds an image of herself. The IP 67.23.5.105 belongs to the same IP-range as adland.tv is hosted on, and Orngavk2 claims to be the same person. The users Missadvert and Caymangreen both edit in an article that was recently deleted, and Missadvert also adds external links (that are later removed) to adland.tv to several other articles. I've grown tired of discussing the same points over and over again on three language versions over an article that, despite different users, keeps having the same incorrect information and would like to have some confirmation (and then block) on some of them so I can focus on other things. The blog in question may be notable, but adding incorrect information to the article doesn't help show that and I would like to find out if these two new users are related to Åsk, her hosting provider, or anyone close to her. SlushSlush has mostly edited in favor for the article (including adding the same incorrect information) on dawp, and may be related as well. GameOn (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added the user Enteroform to the list now. A new user that just happens to wander into the AfD for Adland. Checking on with SUL shows that the user is fluent in danish and swedish as well, just like Åsk etc. GameOn (talk) 09:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I'm actually a New Zealander, and not sure how I've ended up being a sock-puppet. Happy to provide phone number and email to real people who name themselves, to discuss. Please let me know somehow if this is what you want. Enterform 11:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Who I am is of no importance in this case. I've already heard this argument around the article Adland on dawp. In the event that you are not a sockpuppet you are a meatpuppet. Or do you really think we're going to believe you just happened to stumble on the article about Adland? A SUL check verifies that you are most likely able read danish and swedish. GameOn (talk) 11:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

You're being needlessly aggressive and uncivil. Are you saying I can't disagree with you? I was looking for the Adland article, and as you note, I read Danish and Swedish - not that well, as I'm not from either country and wouldn't want to edit or post in either language. Is this par for course when it comes to discussing things on Wikipedia? I have no interest in becoming embroiled in a name-calling war with someone anonymous on the Internet. Just wanted to make my voice heard, and clearly you felt it necessary to stomp on me. Thanks. Enterform 22:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enteroform (talk • contribs)

GameOn already asked Kaare at dawp to run a check user investigation on me. That has been done and GameOn has been told that my account is legit. Despite that he continues to hint in the discussion of the Adland article here at enwp that my account is an alias, and now I ended up here as well. I know that should my account be investigated here it will also turn up legit. So please go ahead. On a sidenote I believe an admin should step in and clear up this debate, since I do not think GameOn is being objective in his judgement of the Adland article. It is quite clear that the discussion cannot be resolved without outside aid. SlushSlush (talk) 16:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Nearly all of these accounts have stopped editing, so I'm closing this case for no with no action taken. Relist if it becomes an issue again. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)