Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sirwal/Archive

02 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Both the accounts are brand new. I had reverted many of Sirwal's edits for being disruptive. Negat immediately was created and re-added Sirwal's edits. Negat was blocked as a sock of JarlaxleArtemis, apparently a long time banned editor/vandal. I think Sirwal is also a sock of JarlaxleArtemis, and should be blocked. Passionless  -Talk  21:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)  Passionless   -Talk  21:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Of course they are not technically related, he keeps coming back with new account daily, avoiding the technical blocks we put on him, here are his latest accounts today, User:Msmsmstruth,User:Ouou9529, User:Anakites, and User:Wizgame54312. This edit just now made by Sirwal helps to show a strong relation between the vandal accounts and Sirwal. Passionless  -Talk  02:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Can someone please block him already, he continues to make disruptive edits every day like this and this where he removes information about israeli occupation of territories, and in the second one exagerates sources for POV pushing. He is no doubt a SPA for the purpose of labelling foreign territory israeli and removing references of military occupation. Passionless   -Talk  09:06, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sirwal is not a new account; it was registered Jan 21. But I'm endorsing to clarify this, as I'm not entirely convinced they're the same. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * From a technical standpoint, they are ❌. Tiptoety  talk 02:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but based on behavior, I'm pretty sure that Sirwal is another editor. I'd like to hear from another clerk, though. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Since Alison blocked Negat nazri kasturi as a sock of JA, I wouldn't be surprised if Sirwal is a meatpuppet since JA has lots of those. If they're not technically related, this would be my best guess. Elockid  ( Talk ) 04:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Based on Elockid's evaluation and my own, I have a feeling this is some form of meatpuppetry. As such I've blocked Sirwal. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)