Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sitush/Archive

24 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

evidence is page Govind Kumar Singh, this user has deleted all information from this page , please check how many time he has deleted all information form this page. please block this ip dress. Vermapriya1986 (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

--Vermapriya1986 (talk) 18:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)the user Sitush is deleting all informations, references form the Page Govind Kumar Singh , he is having so many ids and he is editing article , deleting all informations , references , contents , format , every thing he made this page useless , please check page Govind Kumar Singh he has edited so many time , now he has started same thing but with different user name , please block this person , and this IP address as soon as possible.--Vermapriya1986 (talk) 18:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
You'll need to be much more specific than that. I don't see any evidence these accounts are controlled by the same person. TN X Man 17:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I see no evidence of alternate account abuse. What I do see is a content dispute that should be handled using dispute resolution. TN X Man  18:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

27 March 2011
The User: Sitush, who first nominated for speedy deletion article Govind Kumar Singh on March 5, 2011, has been editing tendentiously article   Govind Kumar Singh. There has been edit warring, On March 21, 2011 the User: Dru of Id and user SudoGhost account was immediately begain editing in the same manner using the same idiosyncratic way of signing their name. In this edit they attempt to show. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Govind_Kumar_Singh&action=edit&undoafter=420513660&undo=420516662, user Sitush has multiple account and he is editing this article with all these account with same Ip address , he has personal issue with this article since he nominated this article for speedy deletion .You can check how many time he is editing single article with same IP address with different user account  in one day  its under edit war , WP:3RR i would like to request you  Please block this IP address for editing this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swetasagar (talk • contribs) 10:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * 22:02, 23 March 2011 SudoGhost (talk | contribs) m (3,319 bytes) (Minor correction) (undo)
 * 22:08, 23 March 2011 SmackBot (talk | contribs) m (3,348 bytes) (Dated . (Build p608)) (undo)
 * 05:44, 24 March 2011 Tbhotch (talk | contribs) (3,410 bytes) (Remove template of an unprotected page) (undo)
 * 07:51, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) (3,348 bytes) (Reverted to revision 420392484 by SmackBot; undue
 * 07:59, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) m (3,395 bytes) (queries) (undo)
 * 7:59, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) m (3,401 bytes) (→Recognition: add year) (undo)
 * 08:05, 24 March 2011 SmackBot (talk | contribs) m (3,430 bytes) (Dated . (Build p608)) (undo)
 * 19:44, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) (3,515 bytes) (rm his website: it is a poor one, using a free hosting
 * 19:54, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) m (3,601 bytes) (→Early life and career: queries - sure I've done this
 * 20:00, 24 March 2011 SmackBot (talk | contribs) m (3,659 bytes) (Dated x 2. (Build p608)) (undo)
 * 20:01, 24 March 2011 SudoGhost (talk | contribs) (3,496 bytes) (→Early life and career: Removed sanskrit, added
 * 20:08, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) m (3,672 bytes) (→Early life and career: answer one of my own queries)
 * 20:09, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) m (3,665 bytes) (→Early life and career: rm abbrev - not used again in
 * 20:10, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) m (3,687 bytes) (→Recognition: correct url - still not wonderfully happy
 * 20:10, 24 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) m (3,687 bytes) (→Recognition: correct url - still not wonderfully happy
 * 17:53, 25 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) m (3,704 bytes) (wikilinks; slight rephrase & grammar) (undo)
 * 19:08, 25 March 2011 SudoGhost (talk | contribs) (3,775 bytes) (Removed WP:WTA) (undo)
 * 05:57, 27 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) (3,787 bytes) (In 2 - Most Innovative was not Let's Design, per text.)
 * 06:02, 27 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) (3,715 bytes) (rm hangover from Wnfck editing) (undo)
 * 06:03, 27 March 2011 Sitush (talk | contribs) (3,722 bytes) (→Early life and career: reinstate abbreviation lost in recent


 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Govind_Kumar_Singh&oldid=420936040--Swetasagar (talk) 09:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)deleted impotent informations about the person, edited article  , Swetasagar (talk) 09:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Swetasagar blocked indef and tagged as a sock of Vermapriya1986. Vermapriya1986 block reset and extended to 1 month for continued sockpuppetry and disruptive editing. No further action needed at this point. Elockid  ( Talk ) 14:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Closing as a bad faith report opened by an account that's evading a block. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

03 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These accounts generally work on articles that are related to Hindu castes, such as Nair, Kayastha, Yadava, etc. The edits made by these accounts appear to be indented to defame Indian ethnic groups by introducing direct quotes and reproductions of accords from biased foreign authors. These accounts, especially and  are used interchangeably in caste related articles and the corresponding talk pages. When one account makes an edit, other one comes up just to say "I also support it" and thus give others an impression that the edits are done by a group of people with consensus among them. BTW, at least two of these accounts are sleepy. The Tiger&#39;s Tail Caught By The Dog (talk) 03:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * As someone who works with several of these users, this is absolutely ridiculous. The editors come from different parts of the world, have completely different writing styles, cover overlapping but non-identical topics...furthermore, the users are generally (especially Sitush) devoted to removing the bias from Indian caste articles.  This nomination is in extreme bad faith with the intention of allowing a large number of articles to remain with non-encyclopedic POV. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * And I see the account has been blocked as a sock of a blocked editor. I recommend this be closed. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Bad-faith request by blocked user Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 03:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Closing - Nothing to do here Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 03:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

21 October 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

--Rockstar1984 (talk) 19:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC) Rockstar1984 (talk) 19:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Another bad faith report. TN X Man 19:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

08 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

India31 (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * SPI opened in bad faith. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 12:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

02 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I have gone through many of his replies earlier. Always we can see a backup from sock1.Kvn nair (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Kvn nair (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

And there was me thinking April Fools' Day was yesterday - this is much funnier than all those joke AFDs and RFAs :-) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * lolno. Writ Keeper (t + c) 19:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * We play good hand/bad hand sometimes, too. And I still think that I was wrong in that thread, I'm just not sure which one is me. - Sitush (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Frivolous. Rschen7754 19:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Retaliatory filing for WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Pnranjith. Reporting user blocked and tagged. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)