Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sivalesnar/Archive

20 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created less than 24 hours after the sockmaster was blocked, his edit summaries are similar, as is his field of editing. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I think the behavior is very similar and a checkuser isn't needed here. I've blocked and tagged the account. Mike V  •  Talk  23:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

23 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pretty obvious duck. Similar edit summaries, edits from the mobile, and vandalises articles instead of improving them, all masked by his edit summaries where he claims to be improving the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * it's, but CU isn't particularly helpful. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It's possible it's a sock, but I'm not so confident with the user's contributions. Mobile editing offers a dropdown list of edit summaries, so many mobile editors will use the same one. There's not much overlap between the users, so I can't make much of a comparison. I don't feel comfortable blocking the account with what's presented here, so I would recommend that you just keep an eye on the account and make another report when it's more conclusive. Mike V  •  Talk  01:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)