Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Skashifakram/Archive

23 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I took a look at a Articles for deletion/List of Muslim Nobel Laureates, and saw that Skashifakram had many votes striked. I was a little suspicious, and I then noticed a new account, Jimindian, popping in, saying to not delete the page. Jimindian stated that he was a newbie, but there was something about that misguided argument that made me think this was an attempt to double/triple/quadruple-vote via sockpuppetry. The second diff shows double voting by Jimindian, a characteristic of Skashifakram. I don't know if this helps, but their user pages say they are both Indian. Meat or Sock? Here are the diffs:  Thekillerpenguin (talk) 02:29, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I am personally very hurt at your behaviour, you decided to call me sockpuppet before extensive discussions! Here are my reasons why you should not accuse me of sockpuppetry.
 * First, In IITB we use a shared IP, so possibly User:Jimindian is a teacher or student or an outsider who came to IITB for a while or exchange student-I dont know.
 * Second, Having a shared IP, we can track what our fellow IITian is editing or doing.
 * Third, Jimindian's vote did not affect the result of the discussion on deletion,others' logics did.
 * Fourth, if someone wants to defend me/fellow IITian why should I oppose.
 * Fifth, some people create user account to avoid shared IP blocking in wikipedia
 * Sixth, the discussion was not based upon vote but consensus,check that I have been blocked for while, I knew that it was not a vote, neither I knew that I can't tell keep more than once, so when someone tampered with my comment, I became angry and commented, unfortunately the comment is now deleted, however you can check my talkpage to know what I said in my unblockin request.Skashifakram (talk) 06:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, assuming these are shared IPs, then please explain why both of you are on the same computer and also on commercial ISPs. --MuZemike 18:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * That is very easy to explain, In every institute there are computer rooms where same computer is used again and again, please check I've never used the same computer and still if you want to insult me, then I will quit wikipedia probably forever,Thank you very much!Skashifakram (talk) 18:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not insulting you; however, I find it hard to believe that both of you are making all these edits two of the same computers both inside and outside your university. --MuZemike 19:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Outside my university!It's a grave accusation!I have never used computer outside my university since 2012!It's beyond tolerance limit!I can't afford it!Skashifakram (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You people are almost insulting me to death!May be they are right! who said you will not be respected in wikipedia..Skashifakram (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Now explain and . He's using the exact same dialogue and comments you are making right now. --MuZemike 19:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Also you say that you are being insulted? Keep in mind that, by engaging in sock puppetry, you are blatantly deceiving the community, hence insulting us. So knock off the "sorry victim" excuse. --MuZemike 19:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You are saying that two people are same because both of them cried of their mother's death!nonsense!I am not leaving wikipedia, I was wrong!Skashifakram (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you seriously think we are that naive and dense? Try again. --MuZemike 19:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * No, I am not, I am extremely sorry if that hurts you but you are continuously hurting me,I love wikipedians and I want to improve wikipedia,what's your point!Skashifakram (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * From today, my advice to people-dont support and dont be supported!I have lost faith in ..........Skashifakram (talk) 19:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You're the one who blatantly tried to deceive the community with sock puppets. If you have lost faith in whatever because you got caught using sock puppets, then you are not impressing us one bit. --MuZemike 19:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have nothing to say!I feel tired!Please in future don't get too serious to choke people to leaving psychologically damaged!I don't blame you but I'm tired answering accusations!Please stop!Skashifakram (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ✅.  Salvio  Let's talk about it! 13:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, wait, I've just started defending myself.Isn't it too early to conclude!Skashifakram (talk) 06:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I concur with Salvio giuliano's findings above; right now, I am not buying Skashifakram's explanation. --MuZemike 18:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

That's great!You have right to say what you say!If you want to call me sockpuppet,I will get hurt but I'll not stop you, if that's what you want.Skashifakram (talk) 19:46, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * We're done here. Jimindian has been indefinitely blocked. Skashifakram, consider this a warning not to pull this off again, or you will be blocked next time. --MuZemike 19:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your extremely kind behaviour!You have done a great job!You could have blocked that user forever! But if he is not sockpuppet then......I dont know..but after all, you are an administrator, I respect your decision!Thank you...Skashifakram (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2012 (UTC)