Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Snookerman/Archive

Evidence submitted by Mkdw
Regarding recent edits made to the article Flash mob.
 * User:Snookerman adds a publicity stunt to the article that does not fit the criteria. Here
 * Same day, User:JMHurum adds a shortened version. Here
 * Also the same day, IP:90.201.211.65 re-adds the changes. Here
 * The next day, IP:79.97.243.247 re-adds the changes. Here.

It should be noted that both JMHurum and the IPs are single-purpose editors and have either never been active prior or had made 2 changes two years ago. Also, Snookerman has not been active except for sparse times in 2010 and then another two years of inactivity.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Mkdw talk 20:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC) . Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I never looked at the country difference. Sorry for the confusion here everyone. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:37, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌. Dominic·t 03:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

No action taken, obviously. Tim Song (talk) 04:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)