Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sojung Lim/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts are only modifying a single article, As One (opera). Both accounts were created on the same day, within hours of one another: ,

Both accounts laid dormant for some time before their first edits: January 29 creation date for both accounts, and late February (17th and 19th) for their first edits.

Rapid editing of page by accounts consecutively, see (12:54 by Flowerpower32),  (13:15 by Sojung Lim),  (13:43 by Flowerpower32.)

Some similar content besides the SPA, like linking reviews and quoting them, see, , , including frequent quotes on reviews of the individual performance. Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I don't see anything which couldn't be explained as two over-enthusiastic friends getting excited by a coming-of-age opera they attended together which "spoke to them". Unlike I'd have opted for a set of uw-agf-sock tags. But we're here, and CU seems the only way to discern between the two possibilities. CU, Please confirm or rebut. Cabayi (talk) 09:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If the allegation should be upheld, Flowerpower32 is the older account. Cabayi (talk) 09:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Another CU has already run checks, and evidently decided not to take any action. Based on what I see in the log, some sort of class assignment is the most likely explanation, as I don't otherwise see any motivation for one person to use multiple accounts in this way. Closing. ST47 (talk) 18:51, 28 February 2020 (UTC)