Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sourcerery/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This editor's account was created two days after Sourcerery was banned. They've edited a list of pages that heavily overlaps with his and have focused on similar requests; see eg: There's many more distinct areas of overlap in the editor interaction tool; most of these areas aren't clearly thematically related, while Aocdnw's brief history here makes the extensive overlap seem unlikely to be a coincidence. --Aquillion (talk) 11:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC) Aquillion (talk) 11:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * : Art Nouveau with an emphasis on the Vienna Succession
 * : Fascism with a focus on wanting it defined as a form of populism
 * : Capitalism and Islam with general objections to the entire article, etc.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There's too much overlap in disparate subject areas for this to be a coincidence. . Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Shortly after User:Sourcerery's most recent sock, User:Aocdnw, was blocked, a new account, Amazonz appeared and immediately started advancing the arguments Sourcerery had most recently been advancing on 2019 Tacoma attack and Autism rights movement. They also leaped straight into incredibly aggressive interactions with myself and several other editors Sourcerery was previously in dispute with, which seems unusual (I hadn't even interacted with Amazonz, yet they appear to have WP:HOUNDed me to a few pages and left an angry message on my talk page.) Their overlap with Sourcery's last account covers two articles on unrelated subjects, and the focus on the same aspects is pretty clear: See here. --Aquillion (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC) Aquillion (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to Sourcerery:
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Account created just after another sock of Sourcerery,, was banned. Re-instated a ridiculous ridiculous edit made by that account and then reported me to ANI on absurd charges which demonstrates an obvious grudge. His accusations against me of "strong POV" are identical to those of Aocdnw. Shows familiar disregard to copyright law. Full contribution history makes it clear that he is a sock. Wikiman2718 (talk) 13:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * See above. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Srid appeared shortly after the master's last set of blocks editing the same contentious topics. Much like the last sock here, they've argued for Sourcerery's view at the talk page and has reinstated it just as Sourcery did, "per talk". Also like the master and socks, Sridc has had almost immediate conflict with the same two editors - Aquillion and bacondrum. It's also worth noting that srid and the master account have both accused Aquillion of bad faith in the same venue. Praxidicae (talk) 16:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ❌ - Sridc is consistently editing from a different continent from the one Sourcerery's confirmed socks have all edited from. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)