Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spaceghostguy/Archive

Evidence submitted by Antiuser
Making the same edits to some of the same pages that User:Spaceghostguy edited. Diffs: User:Spaceghostguy was confirmed by Checkuser to be using the same IP as User:JI Hawkins but there were doubts by one admin over whether he was an actual sockpuppet.  X X X antiuser eh? 22:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Self-endorsing for CheckUser attention for two reasons: first, to get a second opinion as to whether Spaceghostguy = JI Hawkins (as I too have doubts as far as an actual connection is concerned); and second, just to see if there is any connection between Starwars4004 and Spaceghostguy from a purely technical standpoint (as far as behavioral is concerned, I also have doubts however). –MuZemike 06:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ that is  - lemme get back to you on the other connections. This is yet another Crackberry socker -  A l is o n  ❤ 07:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I should have figured actually on that one after looking at this. –MuZemike 07:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Is there anything more beneath SGG (i.e. is Starwars4004 the only sock account under there)? The fact he's using a BlackBerry concerns me, but behaviorally I can't see SGG as being JI Hawkins, so I can only assume SGG made a new account rather than request an unblock request. I've talked with the CU who ran the latest Hawkins check, and he admits that he is not certain that SGG is definitively Hawkins. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Boribori! ) 07:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If Starwars4004 is definitely Spaceghostguy but not definitively JI Hawkins, then I would keep the block on Spaceghostguy and consider either warning or temporarily blocking Starwars4004 on the sock puppetry. –MuZemike 07:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Owch! I've had to take a detailed look at this, but is  to be . Also,  is similarly . There are clear technical reasons why this is the case, which I won't discuss here. From what I can see, SGG only has this one account here -  A l is o n  ❤ 07:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Except that it's still confirmed that SGG is Starwars, or is that now unlikely? –MuZemike 07:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeh. SGG is ✅ to be Starwars. Definitely - A l is o n  ❤ 07:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)