Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spatuletail/Archive

16 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User Spatuletail spent the last 3 days removing well cited information from page Assurant showing ongoing regulations against the bank, because it doesn't agree with the corporate narratice. Each time, user added flags to talk page for Versability. Today, Spatuletail mentioned marking page Brian Penny for deletion, but he didn't realize he actually marked it for deletion under username FreeRangeFrog. Versability (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Comment I'm not sure why I'm supposed to be involved here - the reviewing admin has my full consent to use CU if they see fit. I handled a complaint via OTRS from whom I assume is the user in question, and then I added connected contributor to Talk:Brian Penny since I realized it's a autobiography. See diff. The complaint in itself alleged that was inserting undue material and/or original research into the Assurant article, so I suggested to the person that they take it to WP:DRN since we don't handle content disputes via OTRS. I will note that Versability has not provided diffs as to the alleged mention of Brian Penny being deleted, nor do I see in the history that anyone has marked it with PROD or AFD. I certainly have not edited that article, other than the COI tag in the talk page. Both users have a COI here -  I assume is associated with the company, and  appears to be here to promote himself and his work. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 19:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Clearly not a sockpuppet. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)