Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SpeakersBureau200167/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Same single-minded focus on Claudette Colvin.
 * IP adds content on NMAAHC, which SB had added earlier Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, and thanks for the action and advice. I am involved at Claudette Colvin, the article this sockmaster is focused on. Is there a better place to bring requests like this? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked for a week based on behavior alone. as CUs can't connect an account to an IP address, in a case like this I would generally just block on the behavioral evidence. Not saying you've done something wrong - a second opinion is often useful, and perhaps you're involved and I missed it - but there isn't much technically that SPI can bring to bear on this. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No, if you're involved this is quite correct, but I'd say absolutely blatant cases could also go to AIV where response time is orders of magnitude faster. Certainly I'd block this at AIV. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Favonian indef'ed:
 * as an obvious (in many ways) sock. DMacks (talk) 19:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: master is NLT-blocked as well as content disruption. Please be pro-active in blocking suspected socks. DMacks (talk) 19:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: master is NLT-blocked as well as content disruption. Please be pro-active in blocking suspected socks. DMacks (talk) 19:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)