Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Speakoutfreely/Archive

31 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

After User:Jemiljan got into an edit-war about some material he wanted to add to the Robert Spencer (author) article, and the consensus at WP:BLP/N indicated this kind of material shouldn't be added, two "new" editors (Stabilitas and Ericbloodaxeviking) showed up at the Robert Spencer (author) article to revert on Jemiljan's behalf. These are the only edits these new accounts have ever made. Jayjg (talk) 22:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Likely, but I'll endorse to rule out meatpuppetry. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

✅ that the following match each other:


 * The filed master, however, is technically . Courcelles 04:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * After running poor man's checkuser, behaviour evidence suggest that Jemiljan is not related to Speakoutfreely et al. Jemiljan's account has a solid, continuous editing history while Speakoutfreely's edit history is on-and-off. Speakoutfreely appears to be the sockmaster in the list, given that all other socks have minimal # of edits and most are created recently. Also note that the case reporter, User:Jayjg, was involved in content dispute with Jemiljan over an article (which Speakoutfreely also happens to be editing). I suggest the blocking of all usernames in the list but leave Jemiljan untouched. OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I was not and have never been "in content dispute with Jemiljan over an article". In the future, please make more accurate statements. Jayjg (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Blocked, case needs a little clerking though, but i'm way too tired to do it, and it's way too late for me to be even up. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  06:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to show Speakoutfreely as the master, and I've updated all the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

One of the sole behaviour of was to criticize Jihad while mentioning words like Islamic jihadists and supremacists routinely invoke Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence, as he did here, defending Robert B. Spencer through various socks and use of blog site jihadwatch.org for reference. did the same in their just two edits. here we can see a new user possibly defending Robert spencer editing same Jihad Watch page, with the similar behavior of deliberately pushing the wording Violent Islamic jihad cannot be denied; in their edit summary. I would like to suggest the check for sleepers as well. 37.111.139.70 (talk) 19:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * No real evidence, case from 2011, reporter on an open proxy. ST47 (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)