Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SpeedMcCool/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
user keeps on trying to push in the same changes about the metro area in Minneapolis without consensus. SpeedMcCool tried first in March: 1. a brand-new user, MinneapolisHistorian, tried pushing in the same edit and with a similar edit summary today: 2. in their edit summary, they referenced "re-adding" material showing that they were aware of SpeedMcCool's edits in March (the first and only editor to add the material). activity interaction/interests line up perfectly along with writing style. thanks. -- Titi68999 (talk) 02:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'll leave uw-agf-sock, but I don't see that anything more is required at this point.  -- RoySmith (talk) 15:11, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey there RoySmith,
 * I'm SpeedMcCool, and I can say summarily that I am not related to Minneapolishistorian1963. I added the Twin Cities blurb some months ago because it seemed appropriate, and after some discussion with another user, it was agreed that the heading should include that reference, at which point it was added.
 * Thanks for not banning or otherwise restricting my account. I've been off the Wikipedia beat for a while, but I'm certainly not sockpuppeting to resolve a dispute from many months ago.
 * Thanks again,
 * SpeedMcCool (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Post-archiving note added: also see Sockpuppet investigations/Buzzards-Watch Me Work -- RoySmith (talk) 19:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)