Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sranjanm2002/Archive

25 October 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This particular case relates to the article Jaipur Duronto Express. Sranjanm2002 and the three I.P editors have been editing almost identical information relating to the traction section but in the last few edits have been making almost identical grammatical mistakes during editing. Superfast1111 (talk) 16:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * (to Bbb23) Something like this and . Superfast1111 (talk) 15:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I see the obvious (and disruptive) editing by the named account without logging in. However, I don't see the grammatical errors. Next time, please provide diffs in support of your allegations. I've blocked the named account for 48 hours. The IPs are stale.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * , yes, that would have been lovely, and I appreciate your adding the diffs even after the close. The outcome doesn't change, though.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 11 November 2014 (UTC)