Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sriharsh1234/Archive

26 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar user name (both start with sri, similar length, both have 1234). All 4 pages Srinidhi1234 was also edited by Sriharsh1234 (the hists: 123. Creation time difference by less then 1 week. Mysterytrey 21:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Odd and strange, but I don't see the abuse of multiple accounts (intent to deceive/distrupt/mislead per WP:SOCK). Amalthea  07:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I have asked them to comment. Amalthea  20:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Now declared as an alternate account, nothing left to do here. Amalthea  14:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

08 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

-- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  21:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The master has 200 individual IPs in the last checkable time, so i'm looking into rangeblocking, but it will not be easy. I'll report back here after.
 * ~50% (give or take 10%) of the IPs have logged out edits. Of those edits at least half of those edits, and likely more are pure vandalism. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  21:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Follow up: Range blocks are impossible right now, and likely will continue to be. CUs can look at CU wiki for further data with future socks. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The master has 200 individual IPs in the last checkable time, so i'm looking into rangeblocking, but it will not be easy. I'll report back here after.
 * ~50% (give or take 10%) of the IPs have logged out edits. Of those edits at least half of those edits, and likely more are pure vandalism. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  21:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Follow up: Range blocks are impossible right now, and likely will continue to be. CUs can look at CU wiki for further data with future socks. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The master has 200 individual IPs in the last checkable time, so i'm looking into rangeblocking, but it will not be easy. I'll report back here after.
 * ~50% (give or take 10%) of the IPs have logged out edits. Of those edits at least half of those edits, and likely more are pure vandalism. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  21:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Follow up: Range blocks are impossible right now, and likely will continue to be. CUs can look at CU wiki for further data with future socks. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The master has 200 individual IPs in the last checkable time, so i'm looking into rangeblocking, but it will not be easy. I'll report back here after.
 * ~50% (give or take 10%) of the IPs have logged out edits. Of those edits at least half of those edits, and likely more are pure vandalism. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  21:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Follow up: Range blocks are impossible right now, and likely will continue to be. CUs can look at CU wiki for further data with future socks. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The master has 200 individual IPs in the last checkable time, so i'm looking into rangeblocking, but it will not be easy. I'll report back here after.
 * ~50% (give or take 10%) of the IPs have logged out edits. Of those edits at least half of those edits, and likely more are pure vandalism. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  21:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Follow up: Range blocks are impossible right now, and likely will continue to be. CUs can look at CU wiki for further data with future socks. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The master has 200 individual IPs in the last checkable time, so i'm looking into rangeblocking, but it will not be easy. I'll report back here after.
 * ~50% (give or take 10%) of the IPs have logged out edits. Of those edits at least half of those edits, and likely more are pure vandalism. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  21:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Follow up: Range blocks are impossible right now, and likely will continue to be. CUs can look at CU wiki for further data with future socks. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Double checked at DQ's request; blocked and tagged. Please don't archive right now, I'll make a note about this on AN given the master's obvious attempt to groom for a RfA. &mdash; Coren (talk) 22:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * This can be archived now that the AN discussion has concluded. &mdash; Coren (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

04 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Self-declared sock. I'm not familiar with this particular one, so just adding it to the record. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Typically there is no CU for a DUCK, but in this case there's a history of sleepers. Rschen7754 06:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd say that this account is ✅, but since they're using the same OS/browser combination as almost everyone else on their ranges, detecting sleepers is nearly impossible. If another CU wants to take a crack at it, please feel free to do so. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Tagged the sock. Leaving open for further CU interest. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 22:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Nothing for CU to do here. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  04:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)