Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srobak/Archive

09 January 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Srobak indefinitely blocked on 7 January 2012.

User:Yooperkawi appears on 8 January 2012 as a fully formed editor.

Immediately edits an article which was last edited by User:Srobak on 1 January 2012, follows that by reverting another article to the last edit by User:Srobak , then comments within a section of a talk page User:Srobak created on 31 October 2011 , and then edits an article which was last edited by User:Srobak on 30 December 2011 ‎. memphisto 20:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Srobak was blocked, not banned. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Per WP:DUCK I've blocked and tagged the sock. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:27, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

30 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Srobak left a message on my talk page back in the day regarding "JBLM Lewis McChord", which was followed up in 2013 by this edit by 2ChannelGod on my page, using the same style of writing (including saying "Thanks." at the end of the message). 2Channel has never edited the page before now, so I suspect that they are using the same watchlist as Srobak, as they have multiple overlaps. Furthermore, both users seem to be taking a vigilante approach to the sites that they have both edited together, discouraging people from doing certain edits without a history of editing on the page. Finally, they have very similar edit summaries, which don't normally fall into the range of the average user's summaries. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I presume you meant this as the second diff. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious WP:DUCK, blocked, tagged, closing. Rschen7754 09:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)