Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stanbidder1/Archive

16 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edits styles are similar including Mikelimerick how does it work, an you an employee of wiki? and on Stanbidder1 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stanbidder1&diff=481882757&oldid=481881018 murry1975 why are you deleting my edits? are you employee of wikipedia?]. Also when requesting unblocks Mikelimerick made this mistake and so did  Stanbidder1. Both are new and have a tendency to enter comments in the wrong places, Mikelimerick and Stanbidder1. Both of these are currently blocked. Declan799 is included, I do note after only one edit, under WP:DUCK in a normally stable article. Murry1975 (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Cheers for the quick response Tnxman.Murry1975 (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Thanks for doing the paperwork Murry. Stanbidder1 was blocked by someone else for 48 hours, I blocked Mikelimerick per WP:DUCK and upped Stanbidder1's block to indef until they can convince an admin that this will stop.  I blocked Declan799, but then unblocked, concerned I might have jumped the gun.  I agree with the checkuser request to determine if Declan799's related, an see if Stanbidder1 has created any more accounts. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All three are ✅ matches to each other, but I did not see anyone else. TN X Man 15:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that was certainly quick! Blocking the third now. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem -we aim to please. Marking for close. TN X Man  15:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)