Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stardussst/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skywatcher68 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skywatcher68 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skywatcher68 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skywatcher68 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skywatcher68 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skywatcher68 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skywatcher68 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edit warring to cite Wikipedia in BLPs. Please check for sleepers. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - lots of accounts making the same disruptive edits; please CU to make sure these are all of them. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 23:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Just to get the easy stuff out of the way, all of those are ✅. More to come, probably. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Busy IP range and a common user agent doesn't make for an effective sleeper run, but I did find:
 * I'd be surprised if I didn't miss a few, but that's what I found. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd be surprised if I didn't miss a few, but that's what I found. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd be surprised if I didn't miss a few, but that's what I found. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)