Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stivian/Archive

11 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both SPA's, both only edit Jonathan Djanogly, both removing referenced material critical of the subject, both unresponsive to requests to engage in dialogue. DuncanHill (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * A quick trawl through the content page's history comes up with another four single-use accounts that have been used to edit Jonathan Djanogly from 2008 onwards. Is it possible they could all be operated by the same person? - GrahamSmith (talk) 00:41, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The accused master has been blocked for a short time:
 * "11:38, 18 September 2011 blocked  (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours ‎ (Violation of the three-revert rule: reverting after warning for 3 revert rule)"
 * —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   15:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've blocked and tagged River19 as a sock per WP:DUCK. As to those stale accounts - they're stale, so I'd rather not act on them just yet. Relist as necessary. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * - I notice that River19 has been blocked, but note no action on the master, so wonder if any action needs to be taken there. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  12:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)