Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stonksboiii/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

On June 24, made their first edit and joined wikipedia. By June 30, was blocked permanently for vandalism on the now-deleted Gautham VS article.

Just over one week later, on July 8 of the same year, a new account with a similar username popped up. This account,, likewise has a history of disruptive editing, including a 31-hour block issued by in December of 2020 for edit warring, after a report was made by.

Based off the similarity of the usernames, the way in which the creation of closely followed the issuing of the ban on, and the continued pattern of disruptive editing, I suspect that  may be a sockpuppet of  that is being used to evade a permanent ban. Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm not a sockpuppet, but you've obviously been stalking me for quite awhile. I posted in a talk page that I suspected you were the sockpuppet account of HorseEyeBack, and now you're trying to retaliate against me. It's incredible the amount of length you went through to try to get me banned. lol Stonksboi (talk) 01:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , Stonksboiii is . After reviewing Stonksboiii's deleted contribs, I see absolutely nothing to tie these accounts together other than the similarity in username, and I note that "stonks" has been a memetic phrase for several years . If Stonksboi is being disruptive, they can be dealt with at the appropriate venues. ClosingGeneralNotability (talk) 01:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)