Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Streamboxmarketing/Archive

25 July 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Streamboxmarketing created the article Streambox. When the article was nominated for deletion, the WP:SPA account Abcdeliana magically appeared to defend it. See the deleted user contributions of each account. I am hesitant to call both accounts the same person, since Abcdeliana's comments suggest a different identity, but it seems clear there is some meatpuppetry or collusion going on, at least. I have blocked Streamboxmarketing as a spamusername, not for using multiple accounts. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC) ~Amatulić (talk) 23:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * You've blocked Streamboxmarketing as a spamusername account - therefore this is neither sockpuppetry nor meatpuppetry. Marking case as closed. WilliamH (talk) 06:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Just because I block one account for an unrelated reason has zero bearing on whether that person is abusing multiple accounts. The issue here is not Streamboxmarketing, but the possible sockpuppet Abcdeliana. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Noted, but it's not worth doing anything else now. To sanction Abcdeliana at this stage would be purely punitive., one account per editor please. WilliamH (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2013 (UTC)