Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Strummingbabe/Archive

Report date January 31 2009, 16:44 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

The Zjagolan account has been sitting inactive for a while, but note Strummingbabe's edit/unedit on it here, likely made by accident when he was logged into the wrong account. I also think User:Aurush kazemini is the same person, and all are probably new accounts of banned user User:MiltonP Ottawa, who was found to have sock puppets here. All have similar, semi-randomly selected user pages and all jump in with edits more complicated than a new user would. Zjagolan seems to have picked up where User:Aurush kazemini left off some time ago harassing articles that I've had anything to do with. I thought we were past our silly "feud" but it seems this person is having too much fun to move on. While some of his changes are legitimate (just as with Aurush, Strummingbabe and Milton P), others such as here, seem to be him trying to facetiously replicate some of my own recent edits asking for citations on controversial topics, while he's doing it on petty, undisputed points. While Zjagolan hasn't done it yet, Strummingbabe and Aurush frequently show up in AFDs to vote for each other's position. Could someone please run a checkuser on this account to settle this once and for all? TastyCakes (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by TastyCakes (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * i dont know if i stand accused here, but what the hell is wrong with this tastycakes character? is he mentally ill or something?  he's spent much of the past month shadowing me trying accusing me of being someone named miltonp...i've seen strummingbabe around and i've seen tastycakes around; if anything, it seems pretty likely that strummingbabe is sock puppet of tastycakes, especially when you consider that they're both apparently in canada and have foo foo login names lololol Aurush kazeminitalk 18:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: And how would you have found this page if not through the user talk pages of Strummingbabe or Zjagolan, or the list of my contributions? I would say Aurush popping up here without it being mentioned on his talk page (which was an oversight on my part) is further evidence that he is a puppet/puppet master.  TastyCakes (talk) 20:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * or maybe i just happened to look at some page histories after not being on for a week, but that'd be silly Aurush kazeminitalk 20:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, maybe. In that case, surely you would welcome a checkuser to clear your good name?  TastyCakes (talk) 20:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * there's nothing wrong with my good name - if you want to waste somebody's time checking my ip, go ahead, its not like i can stop you Aurush kazeminitalk 22:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I haven't the foggiest idea who Aurush_Kazemini is. I just looked up TastyCakes cause he was an editor on the Denis Rancourt article.03:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by other users

Requested by TastyCakes (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Some suspect edits, but not enough to call it a WP:DUCK Mayalld (talk) 11:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * ✅ that both of these are User:MiltonP Ottawa again. Also:
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 18:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 18:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * All accounts blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 20:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)