Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stuartzs/Archive

27 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Something very suspicious is going on here, my suspicions were raised by edit from Stko123, it came only a few hours after I posted a COI user message on User Talk:KobieTale (see ), then looking closer at when each of the other account were created Special:Log/KobieTale, Special:Log/BBibble and Special:Log/DasGib all within 3 mins, all of them have involved in University of Waterloo Stratford Campus adding images (some of them copyvios)

I think that a CU is warranted here to make sure that the discussion process is not poisoned by socks.  LGA talk  edits   03:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * King of Hearts has asked me to post the details here :
 * As already stated the three accounts (DasGib, BBibble and KobieTale) were all created within three mins of each other.
 * KobieTale adds an image that less than 10 min before DasGib uploaded to commons.
 * After I KobieTale about COI and editing WP he  to his talk page then does not edit any more. In that COI notice I had directed him to the talk page as a place to discuss things.
 * Stuartzs turns up at the talk page of University of Waterloo Stratford Campus. This having only ever made to the article about a month before and not editing in the mean time. It should also be noted that prior to that they had only made one edit to an article talk page back in.
 * With his next edit to the Stuartzs ask me if I have a conflict of interest which is suspicious as I only mentioned it on KobieTale's.
 * Hope this helps  LGA talk  edits   03:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I cannot comment about the accounts mentioned. I can only comment on what has transpired between myself and LGA. I am interested in the work being done at U of WS which was sparked when I was considering a career move. I have noticed that LGA has been removing licensed images without discussion and put a citation on the page for one of the sections that was in fact, correctly referenced. When I queried him about this, he provided rationale to me that was more opinion than fact. When I questioned this, he levied an allegation of sockpuppetry against me in what seems to be a vindictive move that once again, involves conjecture not fact. I notice that LGA is a clean start and can't help but wonder if he has done this before. I believe he is acting in bad faith. Stuartzs (talk) 15:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I have emailed King of Hearts with more detail (WP:BEANS).  LGA talk  edits   02:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)


 * - The evidence is admittedly not super strong, but it definitely looks suspicious and warrants a check IMO. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


 * All blocked, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)