Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sukanya92/Archive

06 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

1) All of them edit articles related to Bengal. Both try to increase the percentage of bengali speakers by adding false data across articles.-> Sukayna92, Shalinicat and the IP

2) Shalinicat's first edit was to create Sukanya92's userpage commenting, "your edits are nice"

3)Duck evidence: Both revert other editors with exactly the same edit summary language "we will be provoked to consult our suitable administrator", we will have top consult the suitable administrator

They are edit warring across articles, with zero productive edits, threatening the users who revert them. Sodabottle (talk) 06:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This case couldn't be any louder at quacking. These are ducks. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  21:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

If there is any other further doubt, they're both ✅. Sockmaster blocked 1 week; sock indefinitely blocked. –MuZemike 22:12, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

07 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Account opened just hours after blocks of previous socks. Same edit warring behaviour as Sukanya 92 /shalinicat - 1)increase bengali population %: sukanya92, Wikilopez

2)adding bengali script to norah jones:shalinicat, wikilopez

He shows no signs of changing his behaviour.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Sodabottle (talk) 06:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK This is the same guy I asked for a block on last night, and if I'm not mistaken, same statistic & article. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  12:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged --Errant (chat!) 17:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Retagged ;) -- DQ  (t)   (e)  01:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)