Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sulthan ameer/Archive

02 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreation of pages about or involving 'Sulthan Ameer,' in varying forms - quite a bit of which looks like hoax or fantasy. The master is already blocked for creating inapropriate pages. User:220 of Borg and I both were investigating these socks separately, centred on El Cuerpo del Deseo. Per WP:DUCK, I would say that these are blatant socks, but I don't know if there are more that we haven't found. Peridon (talk) 16:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 'Sulthan Ameer' pages date to March/April 2013. Possibly most common page re-/creation was 'De Sultan Ameer' 5 times deleted early March to early May 2015. Also 'de Sultan', deleted 3 times late Feb. to early March 2015. ∇220  of  Borg 01:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Note; In the list below, Haji Sultan Rahi is a suspected sock puppet of Vamsiraj, who also has his (or her) own sockpuppet investigations page. Two reports are actively going on right now. It's possible Vamsiraj might be in that account pile somewhere. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 01:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ...and Akash Guhathakurta. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 01:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Here is some more (maybe) valuable info. First, the order all of the accounts were created;


 * 14:19, 2 January 2013 User account Sulthan ameer (talk | contribs) was created
 * 14:38, 21 February 2013 User account Sulthan Ameer Abdulwahab (talk | contribs) was created
 * 11:22, 28 March 2013 User account Nawintechno (talk | contribs) was created
 * 06:43, 11 November 2014 User account Decentscholar (talk | contribs) was created
 * 00:53, 25 February 2015 User account De Saas (talk | contribs) was created
 * 07:34, 9 March 2015 User account Vinay shankar tiwari (talk | contribs) was created
 * 10:14, 12 March 2015 User account Kailsh kumar (talk | contribs) was created
 * 06:52, 21 March 2015 User account Akash Guhathakurta (talk | contribs) was created
 * 11:59, 9 April 2015 User account Haji Sultan Rahi (talk | contribs) was created
 * 10:55, 10 April 2015 User account Shepon Sheikh (talk | contribs) was created
 * 18:44, 17 April 2015 User account Abrar shariff (talk | contribs) was created
 * 16:53, 19 April 2015 User account El Cuerpo del Deseo (talk | contribs) was created
 * 10:58, 21 April 2015 User account Alfa Alhassan Peter (talk | contribs) was created
 * 14:58, 29 April 2015 User account Gururaj varnekar (talk | contribs) was created

All of the italics are indefinitely blocked, and all of the bolds are accounts with no contributions whatsoever. I highly think the 2015 tier of accounts are all suspicious. De Saas is the only account in that tier that is normal, no bolded/italic text. Additionally, I do NOT think Nawintechno is a sockpuppet either because he's out of calibration with the rest of the accounts. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 02:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Constantly recreating articles about "Sultan Ameer". Sleepers check is also needed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This case appears to involve some open proxies and webhosts, as such, please review all contributions and evaluate the behavioral evidence before taking action. Simply put, if there is doubt, do not block based solely on the CheckUser results. The following are ✅:


 * and are .  Tiptoety  talk 22:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Moved to SPI/Sulthan ameer, the oldest account (was at SPI/Sulthan Ameer Abdulwahab). ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, case moved to the older account (Sulthan ameer, as blocked, not CU confirmed), which is easily connected (behaviourally and name-wise) to Sulthan Ameer Abdulwahab ( as a blocked sock without CU confirmation). The others are all  as CU confirmed socks, except for Nawintechno -- per Zeke's point, my own review, and Tiptoety's caution, I'm not conviced THEY are related to the rest. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

12 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Okay so it appears there is even a OLDER account that this guy goes under then! I already mentioned that the guy has recreated many of the sock puppet pages Wgolf (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment-actually this one is newer then the other one! Wgolf (talk) 19:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing this here, was ✅ to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj.  ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  16:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The behavioral evidence actually links and, but the latter is marked as indef-blocked as a sock of Sulthan ameer, hence the filing of a report under SA. I cannot see them listed at the SA case, and apologize in advance if I messed something up.

Both create articles of dubious notability around Indian music, in particular Bollywood soundtracks: Urukkara , Chandasmani.

Moreover, the timing is suspicious: Chandasmani blocked on May 30 for two weeks, which is then extended to indef on SP grounds, and the other account is created on June 15, i.e. roughly as the original block would have expired; one could suppose that they tried to log in the old account, failed (because of the upgrade to indef), and then created another one. Tigraan Click here to contact me 16:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Very Funny Claim Indeed! I don't know who the hell this Sulthan Ameer is. May be he created film articles on Bollywood as I'm creating, this doesn't indicate that I'm a ghost of that guy. Many a people are involved in editing and creating ame category of articles. That doesn't make them the very same person, ok? This type of harassments are not acceptable Urukkara (talk) 19:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ✅ when checked against blocked sock .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  20:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)